Talk:Sorcerer (Linux distribution)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Sorcerer (Linux distribution) article.
Article policies
This article is part of the Linux WikiProject, a group of Wikipedians interested in improving the encyclopaedic coverage of articles relating to Linux, and who are involved in developing and proposing standards for their content, presentation and other aspects.
If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.
Start This article has been rated as start-Class on the quality scale.

[edit] POV

horrible POV text, absolutely not suitable for wikipedia

No kidding, that was the most biased historical account ever. I don't think Pravda could have been so biased. I'd just as soon remove it... --Lucifer arma 08:32, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
Done. You'd honestly think these people were seven years old. Chris Cunningham 13:25, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Sorcerer1.png

Image:Sorcerer1.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:46, 6 June 2007 (UTC)