Talk:Sophrology
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Article problems
I would suggest that this is too pro-sophrology, with little or any criticism. I also question the "many years of scientific research" claim. Wee Jimmy (talk) 21:19, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
- There are currently no refs at all, it reads like advertising, and there are other problems. If there are no third-party secondary sources, is this subject even notable? AndroidCat (talk) 15:27, 9 April 2008 (UTC)