Talk:Sophia Stewart

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or if there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
	This article is supported by the Arts and Entertainment work group.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Sophia Stewart article.
Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers. This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject.	Be polite Assume good faith No personal attacks Be welcoming	Article policies No original research Neutral point of view Verifiability

Contents 1 POV 2 some context for the terminator claims 3 Update to Sophia Stewart 4 some context for the terminator claims 5 Update to Sophia Stewart 6 Fucking unbelievable. Cut the bureaucratic nonsense.

[edit] POV

Added a POV check. Article lacks sources for its claims. -01

This could be completely false. Search at all major news sources such as NBC, CBS, ABC, Associate Press, or even entertainment weekly for info on Sophia Stewart. There is no news. There is no information. There is nothing about a lawsuit. So if someone finds official information, please post.

~Queball

Here is a link to a article about sophia stewarts claim Media:http://www.bet.com/Entertainment/sophiastewartmatrix.htm?wbc_purpose=Basic&WBCMODE=PresentationUnpublished

[edit] some context for the terminator claims

Added a quick paragraph to give some context to plagarism claims about the "Terminator" franchise: Ms. Stewart is actually not the first person to make this claim...

--Dr memory 15:14, 23 July 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Update to Sophia Stewart

http://www.daghettotymz.com/matrix/matrix.html

there has been a great deal of material added to the sophia stewart page that i believe are noteworthy

Can you repost the link it is not working, and what is the latest in her case. (NitaReads 07:36, 27 November 2006 (UTC))

This page needs to be updated; the references are dead links and nonspecific. If no one does it soon, I will. I will document the changes I make here in the talk page, but remember there is also the history pages as well. --Trakon 06:14, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

Added a POV check. Article lacks sources for its claims. -01

This could be completely false. Search at all major news sources such as NBC, CBS, ABC, Associate Press, or even entertainment weekly for info on Sophia Stewart. There is no news. There is no information. There is nothing about a lawsuit. So if someone finds official information, please post.

~Queball

Here is a link to a article about sophia stewarts claim Media:http://www.bet.com/Entertainment/sophiastewartmatrix.htm?wbc_purpose=Basic&WBCMODE=PresentationUnpublished

[edit] some context for the terminator claims

Added a quick paragraph to give some context to plagarism claims about the "Terminator" franchise: Ms. Stewart is actually not the first person to make this claim...

--Dr memory 15:14, 23 July 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Update to Sophia Stewart

http://www.daghettotymz.com/matrix/matrix.html

there has been a great deal of material added to the sophia stewart page that i believe are noteworthy

Can you repost the link it is not working, and what is the latest in her case. (NitaReads 07:36, 27 November 2006 (UTC))

This page needs to be updated; the references are dead links and nonspecific. If no one does it soon, I will. I will document the changes I make here in the talk page, but remember there is also the history pages as well. --Trakon 06:14, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fucking unbelievable. Cut the bureaucratic nonsense.

Any sane person who reads that article sees that it could just as well have been written by herself or by a PR representative. It is simply outrageous enough to not incite any form of further exposition. To put in a "POV check" and then complain that there is no information available in mainstream media and that the article does not cite its sources - I couldn't believe my eyes - all too telling of the stupid, inefficient methods practised here at this website. The author must certainly be laughing his ass off. So just delete the shit like you do with any other form of vandalism, you fucking idiots! Staretsen 02:01, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

Bah, seems like an angel of act on instinct made my post outdated even while I was writing it. A good rant is nice once in a while though. Staretsen 02:03, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

This went well beyond "potentially POV" to a ton of unsourced and very likely false negative information, much of it against living people/existing organizations, which I removed per WP:BLP. I'll have this on watch in case anything libelous is reinserted. For now, it needs to be either secondarily sourced (meaning, "something the subject did not write"), or nominated for deletion on non-notability. I'll hold off on that for now, it seems to have been mentioned in the LA Times-but that article is entitled "The Billion-Dollar Myth"! I'll see if I can get hold of that article. Seraphimblade 02:16, 8 February 2007 (UTC)