Talk:Sonata No. 9 (Scriabin)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Wouldn't some parts of this artice be considered invalid for use on Wikipedia because they express a non-neutral POV? For example "The ninth sonata is an unmistakable masterpiece ... sounding like demented twittering birds..." I would call these opinions, not facts. For example, what if I don't think the ninth sonata is a masterpiece? And I don't hear any demonic twittering birds in it either. I think this article needs some revision. Unless, of course, somebody could back these statements up by showing who it is that is expressing these opinions (ex. "Vladmir Horowitz said that he thought the ninth sonata sounded like demonic birds...") Lunasspectos29 12:04, 28 September 2007 (UTC)