Talk:Son of a Plumber
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
I love this album, but the article is ridiculously fanboyish, with none of the formality and neutrality one would expect to find in an encyclopedia article. I agree with all of the superlatives thrown at the album, and Gessle's talent, but it has no place here.--190.37.176.12 23:26, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
I agree that there are superlatives, however it is in a musical analysis section which should highlight the good and bad points of an album. I think it should stay, or perhaps be modified to be a bit less biased!! Kojack0 08:09, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
- But the problem is that the analysis seems to have been done by the contributor himself. That is original research, which is not acceptable on Wikipedia. Citing reputable third-party reviews would be fine, but simply adding one's own opinions is not. I think this is the best album Per has ever done, but we can't just throw that in the article without a reputable source to back it up.--RicardoC 16:58, 1 October 2006 (UTC)