Talk:Somerset Coal Canal

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Good article Somerset Coal Canal has been listed as one of the Geography and places good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can delist it, or ask for a reassessment.
An entry from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know? column on October 10, 2006.
May 21, 2008 Good article nominee Listed

.

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Somerset, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics connected with Somerset. If you would like to participate, you can visit the WikiProject Somerset project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.
Good article GA This article has been rated as GA-Class.
Mid This article has been rated as mid-importance on the importance scale.
UK Waterways Portal
This article is within the scope of the UK Waterways WikiProject.

This is a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the UK's canals and navigable rivers. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Please also feel free to join in the discussions on the project's talk page.
Good article GA This page has been rated as GA-Class on the quality scale.
Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.


[edit] Survey

WP:Good article usage is a survey of the language and style of Wikipedia editors in articles being reviewed for Good article nomination. It will help make the experience of writing Good Articles as non-threatening and satisfying as possible if all the participating editors would take a moment to answer a few questions for us, in this section please. The survey will end on April 30.

  • Would you like any additional feedback on the writing style in this article?


  • If you write a lot outside of Wikipedia, what kind of writing do you do?


  • Is your writing style influenced by any particular WikiProject or other group on Wikipedia?


At any point during this review, let us know if we recommend any edits, including markup, punctuation and language, that you feel don't fit with your writing style. Thanks for your time. - Dan Dank55 (talk)(mistakes) 03:36, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Review for GA

This is definitely a good article, but ity still needs lots of work. 25 references is okay, but it could be better. I want to see some improvement! Good job! ~Meldshal42Hit meWhat I've Done 20:23, 21 May 2008 (UTC)