Talk:Software agent

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer science, which aims to create a comprehensive computer science reference for Wikipedia. Visit the project page for more information and to join in on related discussions.
Start rated as Start-Class on the assessment scale
High rated as High-importance on the assessment scale

[edit] This article is still a mess...

and the examples are, well, non-agents. I.e.

Buyer agents (shopping bots) => collaborative filtering != agents

User agents (personal agents) => form filling software != agents

...

[edit] Merge Software agent with Intelligent agent?

Maybe the person who has proposed the merge could state their reasons here? AFAIAC intelligent agents are a subcategory of software agents ... I propose to keep the scope of this page as is, until enough work has been done on the IA subsection to merit splitting it off as its own page ("Intelligent Agent (Software)" phps.?) These are distinct concepts and a merge of two weak pages does not create a strong one. --Boris 23:02, 15 February 2006 (UTC)


[edit] Major edit proposals

This article is a mess!

  • It is in desperate need of clear structuring;
  • Irrelevant content needs to be deleted;
  • Redundancy needs to be removed;
  • English grammar needs to be revised;
  • Many sentences don't actually make sense.

I plan to revise this article over the weekend (Jan 21/22 2006), if anyone has taken ownership and/or has any stake in this article please comment here. If there are any suggestions on edits, let's hear about them. -- Steipe 13:58, 20 January 2006 (UTC)

Let's not make things too hasty, friend. Your proposal did not show how you plan to edit the article(you are not planning to rewrite them all by yourself, do you ?).

I think a new article structure would be a good start, since it was bad structure that led to this mess in the first place. What do everybody else say ?

--Cynehelm 19:32, 20 January 2006 (UTC)

Cool. Someone cares about this page. :-)

Since there was no further comment to the outline I had posted here, I went ahead with the change (the outline is now the new TOC). This is essentially a structural change (moving things into their appropriate place), very little was removed or edited for now. Let the fun begin. --Steipe 04:58, 23 January 2006 (UTC)

Next: the examples section.

I propose to condense most of those 'bots into one subsection together with spiders and crawlers, delete collaborative filtering (OT), and discuss some "real" examples, such as the ones from the CMU Agent Lab [1]. Data mining should really be data prospecting (distinction should be explained here). The BotSpot site looks like product-placement to me (no information there). Among the other examples: DAML and OWL are irrelevant in this context, as are the reference to BSD, CTSS and Maxwell's demon. In what sense a daemon can be viewed to be an agent requires a bit of comment. Comments ?

--Boris 23:52, 23 January 2006 (UTC)

Considering the excitement generated around General Magic's system about 10 years ago and the lack of success I feel it would be useful to add a historical section that could also explain why these failed. On the paper it looks like a brilliant idea but agents are not quite teeming around here.

There is a troublesome trend in mass deletion of external links on account of "link spam". To dodge that bullet I propose linking to the GNU/Linux AI & Alife HOWTO (part of Linux Documentation Project) and has been under active revision for 10 years.

That HOWTO also includes IRC bots, something missing from this article. --15:53, 24 April 2006 (UTC)

I also find this article has a lack of sources. One probably isn't enough for such a high-stakes subject. -- Oddb411 (talk) 14:43, 31 March 2008 (UTC)