Talk:Soft Machine
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Jazz, set up to organize and expand entries on jazz and related subgenres, as well as other related subjects. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page (see Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ for more information). |
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page. | ||
| B | This article has been rated as B-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ] | ||
 |
This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed biographical guide to musicians and musical groups on Wikipedia. | ||
Contents |
[edit] Soft_Machine#Beginnings_and_the_.22classic_quartet.22
I added the sentence "Fourth was the first of their afterwards instrumental albums." Not being a native english speaker, I am not sure if thats an acceptable wording, if not, maybe someone could fix it. Cheers, --BNutzer 17:19, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Andy Summers
Andy Summers was a guitarist for this band for, if I remember, six months, (did not record) I believe it was in 1968, according to the famous Family Tree that was in the Echo Box set and elsewhere, and deserves a mention here as well as an add to the lovely band "box", which I, as of yet, have no idea how to edit. I've added a section on Soft Machine to the jazz fusion page. There are people here with tons of knowledge, obviously, and a very well done piece - my thanks. Any help would be appreciated. Tvccs 09:00, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
[1] Yep...there's at least one source...it was 1968.
Added Summers mention in 1968 after verifying with multiple sources - would still be good to get him into the "box", and I'd still like to know how to make/edit those - thanks again Tvccs 09:23, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
- Doh, I had never realized he had been with them ... thanks for expanding my concept of reality ;) I have added him to "the box" (glad you like it btw), which is Template:Soft Machine and can be edited just like any article.
- To create a new one, open/save [[Template:Your new template]]
- to add it in an article, use {{Your new template}}
- For more info, see Wikipedia:Navigational templates, I made this one by copying and pasting from Template:ABBA by the way :) BNutzer 10:26, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
-
- Thanks for the pointer...now I know...finally. Tvccs 14:20, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Picture
Nice picture you added there, Tvccs, thanks a lot! BNutzer 20:48, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Album no. 5 is actually 'Fifth'
I may appear picky, but their album no. 5 is actually referred to as 'Fifth'. Any reason 'Five' is used in the article? Just wanted to check before changing it. --Robertonagel 10:35, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Which image(s) to use in the article/infobox
I disagree completely with the replacement of the 1970 Image:Softmachine70-Promo4.jpg
by the 1967 Image:Softmachineart.jpg in the article's infobox, and I think Softmachineart.jpg, which only represents the psychedelic beginnings of the Softs, should only be used in the article, but not in the infobox. In my view, Softmachine70-Promo4.jpg, showing the 4 "classic quartet" members, is far more adequate for representing the band. Any other views on this, please? BNutzer 18:16, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
- I agree, the whole psychedelic image was only part of Soft Machine at the very beginning of their career and would be misleading for a reader. Essentially, Soft Machine was a jazz fusion band. The band picture is much better.-h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h 18:42, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
- While I much prefer the freedom and risk taking of the early Soft Machine to the dead hand of Fusion, I do think that the Infobox impage should be a band picture and the Wyatt-Ratledge-Hopper-Dean line-up is appropriate for that. The poster image is a good historical artefact though - perhaps shift it into illustrating the Beginnings section? AllyD 18:53, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
- I prefer fusion to psychedelia, although I like both. Ultimately though it's about what's the most appropriate for the article.-h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h 10:48, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- I re-added Softmachine70-Promo4.jpg to the infobox and added the beautiful (isn't it) Softmachineart.jpg to the Beginnings section, and in my view, it fits there like a charm. Thanks for your input - I like both of the early Softs and their jazz fusion work, btw. Cheers, BNutzer 18:50, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- I prefer fusion to psychedelia, although I like both. Ultimately though it's about what's the most appropriate for the article.-h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h 10:48, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Anyone interested in improving this to GA?
It could, and should, be done.--h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h 18:07, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
