User talk:Soetermans
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 Archives |
| Archive 2006 |
Archives |
| Archive 2007 |
Contents |
[edit] Concerning proper game title formatting and detailed game information.
The capitalization that you view in error is actually the proper way to spell them: Dance Dance Revolution with MARIO, Dance Dance Revolution MARIO MIX, Dancing Stage MARIO MIX, Dance Dance Revolution HOTTEST PARTY, and so on. That is the method that Konami has used for the DDR series of games since their release almost 10 years ago: Dance Dance Revolution BEST HITS, Dance Dance Revolution KONAMIX, Dance Dance Revolution EXTREME, and so on. GAMECUBE is the proper formatting of that brand as well, look at the wikipedia article for GAMECUBE and you'll see the "encyclopedic" formatting for the brand but you will also see the game logo which incorporates all caps. Again, this is not a violation of any Wikipedia guideline (As if they were set in stone). In fact the Wikipedia guidelines state that using proper formatting within the article's text is useful.
In addition, do not remove the game information regarding MARIO MIX gameplay, the content may not fit perfectly into an encyclopedic article I agree but all the DDR articles are undergoing renovation by me a couple of other editor at the moment. There is also no grounds to flat out remove it as they explain to readers the connection between DDR and the Mario universe and give them a better understanding of how the gameplay differs from a typical DDR title. I also need that information to be there when I apply a major update to the series main article which has a "For further details see" tag right to that content. Something that won't work if you keep deleting it.
I appreciate that you're trying to help, and I don't mean to step on your toes, but please do not revert the edits in question again as they are correct. Allow experts on the subject to continue to make changes to make the articles better for the community and better suited for this site. It's a slow process but it's one that will be pleasant and appreciated once other editors and readers can see the direction that we are going. If you have any other questions feel free to ask, I trust you will not feel that you have to go to war over this. --AeronPrometheus (talk) 18:22, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
- Looks like that newbie still hasn't learned, I just had to go through and de-capitalize the article again. He also screwed with many of the redirects for DDR games, requiring me to get an admin to help move them (look at and see that a lot of them are at titles that violate MOSTM). TJ Spyke 10:47, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Editing of the Teresa May Page
Why did you remove the statement regarding Teresa's birthday? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Miss-teresa-may (talk • contribs) 17:20, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
This comment was added as too many times this page has had Teresa's birth date altered. She is fed up with people making her older than she really is. How would you suggest that I word it then?--Miss-teresa-may (talk) 09:26, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Hip hop culture
Thanks for your contributions to Hip hop culture.-RoBoTamice 13:05, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] User space edits
Please don't change my user page. Thank you! — OranL (talk) 23:10, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] 3RR
cross posted from WP:EAR
I would note that Soetermans has stepped over the line of the three revert rule, reverting 4 times in the last 24 hours (1, 2, 3, 4). I have not blocked you from a generous understanding that we are in conversation about this right now, but any further reverts in the next 24 hours will get you blocked. StoneCold is one revert away from violating the three revert rule, which will also result in blocking. Pastordavid (talk) 13:15, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Proposed deletion of Baek Ji Young discography
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Baek Ji Young discography, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Blanchardb-Me•MyEars•MyMouth-timed 22:43, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
