From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
|
|
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it. |
| B |
This article has been rated as B-Class on the assessment scale. |
| Mid |
This article has been assessed as mid-importance on the assessment scale. |
 |
This article was nominated for deletion on 31 December 2007. The result of the discussion was withdrawn by nominator. —BoL 23:54, 5 January 2008 (UTC). |
[edit] Assessment
The recent expansion from stub to article was a great step in the direction to formal review for "Good Article". Areas of expansion could be: Opposing arguments of the UK at trial and expansion of the importance/significance section to include references to articles on human rights, death penalty etc. (for instance: petioner's use of the case in Hamdan v. Rumsfeld, Supreme Court justice Breyer's opinions etc.). I have initially rated it as "mid" importance, but it may be assessed as "high" or "low" importance depending on alternative viewpoints. Legis Nuntius (talk) 22:24, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
