From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
|
|
Blocked as a sockpuppet
You have been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet of a banned or blocked user. As a blocked or banned user you are not entitled to edit Wikipedia. All your edits have been reverted.
Details of how to appeal a block can be found at: Wikipedia:Appealing a block. Khoikhoi 22:26, 3 April 2007 (UTC) |
This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.
Request reason: "I am not a sockpuppet of Afrika Paprika. I am a legitimate sockpuppet of a different Wikipedia editor. For privacy reasons, I will not reveal which user I am, but if the blocking admin will give me an email address, I will tell him which legitimate editor I am. As I am not a sock of this banned user, I also request that my report be un-deleted (Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Giovanni Giove (2nd))"
Decline reason: "Regardless of whether this sockpuppet account is being used abusively or not, this username seems to be problematic per WP:U, so this is somewhat moot. Mangojuicetalk 16:48, 4 April 2007 (UTC)"
Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.
- You don't need an email address; you can click the email button on the userpages. Patstuarttalk·edits 16:39, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
- And no, using a second account to open up a SSP inquiry and make a complaint against another editor is not a legit second account. Even if you were another editor, this would be using a second account to avoid scrutiny: please see WP:SOCK. Patstuarttalk·edits 16:40, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
