Talk:Social class in American history

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents 1 Outline 2 Turnerian Models 3 Beardian and Marxist Models 4 Labor Studies 5 Ethnoreligious Models and Voting Studies 6 Race, Class and Gender Models 6.1 Discussion of outline

[edit] Outline

[edit] Turnerian Models

[edit] Beardian and Marxist Models

[edit] Labor Studies

[edit] Ethnoreligious Models and Voting Studies

[edit] Race, Class and Gender Models

[edit] Discussion of outline

I like this article as outlined. I'll do what I can although I am totally too busy. Fred Bauder 15:01, 12 January 2006 (UTC)

Thanks. I've started with bibliography then will go back and add content material. Please jump in! Rjensen 15:04, 12 January 2006 (UTC)

This is nothing more than a bibliography... it needs expanding. --Golbez 11:31, 13 March 2006 (UTC) wheree the hell is social class clasificaton

Please outline on the talk page not the article itself. Having a collection of section headings w/o corresponding sections hurts WPs credibility. Also, no offense, I appreciate the effort and understand the time constraints of real life, but if this article remians wihtout any actual text, I will have to replace the giant bibliography with a redirect to the social structure in the US article (One step short of deletion as I see potential). Again, I am not trying to be harsh, but am concerned over how an article w/o a body is going to make WP look. Thank you for understanding. Regards, Signature^brendel 08:50, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

Let's just keep the outline for now. I plan to fill in many of the details. Rjensen 09:17, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

Regarding "This is nothing more than a bibliography": There are currently more "references" than sentences in the article, so it is unlikely that they are all truly references for the article. Books that are not actually referencing the information in the article should be moved off the main page until they do. -AED 04:23, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

Nonsense. This article is being written section by section, using the sources listed. It takes a while to cover such a cast topic so I hope editors will either be patient or actually help out by doing some reading and writing. Rjensen 05:18, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

Which part of my statement do you consider "nonsense"? Are you asserting that every book listed in the References section actually references a particular statement in ther article? If not, remove them from the article until they do. One way to "help out" is to not give false impressions to other readers of the article. -AED 20:34, 25 September 2006 (UTC)