Socket 940
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article does not cite any references or sources. (December 2006) Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unverifiable material may be challenged and removed. |
 |
The tone or style of this article or section may not be appropriate for Wikipedia. Specific concerns may be found on the talk page. See Wikipedia's guide to writing better articles for suggestions.(December 2007) |
| Socket 940 | |
|---|---|
 |
|
| Specifications | |
| Type: | PGA-ZIF |
| Contacts: | 940 |
| FSB : | 200 MHz System clock 800 MHz / 1 GHz HyperTransport |
| Voltage range : | 0.8 - 1.55 V |
| Processors: | AMD Athlon 64 FX AMD Opteron |
| This article is part of the CPU socket series | |
Socket 940 is a 940-pin socket for 64-bit AMD server processors. The socket is entirely covered with leads, except for four key pins used to align the processor. AMD Opterons and the older AMD Athlon 64 FX (FX-51) use Socket 940. Being an intended server platform, processors using this socket only accept registered memory, because, in servers, memory errors are less acceptable and cause more damage.[1]
The more common use of Socket 940 is in the Server market. Dual Socket 940 boards use the 200-series Opterons. Four(Common) or Eight(Rare) socketed boards use the 800-series Opterons. The Socket 940 platform is designed for raw power and professional accuracy, not bleeding-edge gaming performance.
There is a new 940-pin socket called AM2. Though the current Socket 940 and the AM2 both share the same number of pins, they are not pin-compatible. That is, a Socket 940 processor will not fit in an AM2 socket. The same is true in reverse; a Socket AM2 processor will not fit in Socket 940. The reason for this is because all 64-bit AMD processors, unlike all current Intel processors, include the memory management functionality not as a discrete chip on the motherboard, but rather on the CPU die itself.[2] That means that, if someone wishes to utilize a newer type of memory (e. g. DDR2 vs. DDR), then AMD would need to manufacture an entirely new microprocessor with entirely new memory management electronics built into the chip in order for that newer memory to be usable. This is exactly the situation here; Socket AM2 is designed for DDR2 memory, whereas Socket 940 is designed for DDR (occasionally called "DDR1") memory. This issue highlights one of the disadvantages of including the memory management functions on the CPU die itself. However, performance benchmarks suggest a significant performance increase by doing so, hence AMD's decision to take this design route.
For somewhat related reasons, Socket 939 processors cannot be used in Socket 940 motherboards, even though both Socket 939 and Socket 940 CPUs support the same DDR (aka "DDR1") memory. The distinction here is that Socket 940 requires more expensive registered memory, whereas Socket 939 uses less expensive unbuffered memory. There are also issues of electrical capacitance which lead to four-layer vs. six-layer motherboards (the latter are slightly more expensive to manufacture), which was the reason for the genesis of Socket 939; Socket 940 requires six-layer motherboards. This pin-incompatibility was known to cause some frustration when AMD moved the Athlon 64 FX processor, their premier gaming platform, from a Socket 940 (Opteron 1xx) basis to Socket 939; users who wanted more speed needed to purchase and install an entirely new motherboard. AMD's motivation for Socket 939 was entirely driven by perceived total system cost. However, even after this socket change, the Athlon 64 FX series remained a relatively high cost option, even at times slightly higher than a comparable Socket 940 Opteron.[citation needed] Given the Opteron's excellent performance, it was not unheard of for Socket 940 Opteron 1xx sales to actually cannibalize Athlon 64 FX sales, even at times among the FX's target market, gamers.
Given AMD's recent proliferation of CPU socket platforms, questions about Socket 940's longevity abound on the Internet. Socket 940 was, from the start, primarily geared toward server and higher-end workstation markets, where purchasing decisions are traditionally conservative and customers are known to depreciate (and thus use) their existing gear over at least a five-year cycle. Thus, AMD's plans for Socket 940 stretch out several years into the future, and longevity for this platform is expected to be relatively long. As an example, Socket 5, made famous by the Intel Pentium processor, was in active manufacture, in various backwards-compatible forms including Super Socket 7, for over five years. Socket 370, championed by Intel's Pentium III and Celeron lines, lasted for a similar time frame.[citation needed]
Note that, regardless of the socket form factor, all 64-bit AMD processors will run all of the same software; they are all fully binary-compatible.
[edit] Chipsets
Socket 940 motherboards are currently available with the following chipsets:
- AMD's own 8000-series
- VIA K8T890
- nVidia nForce3 Pro
- nVidia nForce4 Professional
Socket 940 motherboards are currently available from many manufacturers, including:
[edit] References
- ^ Kronlund, Doug (2004-06-27). Socket 940 vs. 939. Short-Media. Retrieved on 2007-01-28.
- ^ Bert Töpelt; Daniel Schuhmann, Frank Völkel (2006-05-23). AM2: AMD Reinvents Itself. Tom's Hardware Guide. Retrieved on 2007-01-28.
[edit] External links
- AMD Product Information
- AMD Technical Details for Athlon64 and Athlon FX
- AMD Socket 940 Design Specification
|
|||||||||||
