User talk:Snillet

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is my talk. If you have any questions, please whrite them there:

Snillet 18:48, 26 May 2005 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Please help on William Shakespeare

 Thank you for your support of the Article Improvement Drive.
This week William Shakespeare was selected to be improved to featured article status.
Hope you can help…

Posted by PruneauT 01:00, 20 June 2006 (UTC) on behalf of the AID maintenance team.

[edit] My (Mtz206) RfA

Thanks for supporting me in my RFA. My Request was successful with 41 supports, 12 opposes and 5 neutrals, and I'll do my best to live up to your expectations. If in any point in the future you get the feeling I'm doing something wrong, do not hesitate to drop me a line. -- mtz206 (talk) 02:51, 22 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] You helped choose Cactus as this week's WP:AID winner

 Thank you for your support of the Article Improvement Drive.
This week Cactus was selected to be improved to featured article status.
Hope you can help.

MER-C 03:18, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Lesnaya

On what grounds do you consider it a draw, instead of a Swedish defeat? Sweden lost a lot more men and Lewenhaupts force was reduced when it met the main army, meaning Sweden had less men in Poltava. It was also a moralic boost for the Russians. --88.114.242.180 18:00, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

Well, in the battle, the Swedes and the Russians lost about the same number of troops, but several thousens got drunk or disappered after the battle, because Lewenhaupt decided to leave the battlefield in the dark, and there was total chaos in the Swedish army. And also I woluld call it at tactical Swedish victory, because Lewenhaupt managed to fight back, even if he had less troops. But it was definitely a strategic and morale Russian victory. /Snillet 15:49, 29 August 2007 (UTC)