Talk:Snickelways of York

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of the UK Roads WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the UK's road network. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the assessment scale.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
Good article Snickelways of York was a nominee for good article, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There are suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
May 10, 2008 Good article nominee Not listed
Snickelways of York is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yorkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the Project's assessment scale.
See comments for details.
Low This article has been rated as Low-Priority on the Project's priority scale.

[edit] Reasons for GA failure

First: The article is simply not comprehensive enough. Can we find some history on these things? Why did they evolve like that? What role have they played in the city's growth and development. The term may be new but what it refers to isn't.

Second: Lack of key citations, despite brevity of article. "... and has even been used in official council documents". Something like this, especially when the article admits the term is a neologism, absolutely must be cited. Ditto with "...a technique which Jones explicitly acknowledged as inspired by the Pictorial Guides of Alfred Wainwright." If he said it somewhere, we need a note.

Third: Footnotes insufficient and not in the proper format.

It seems like there's a lot more to be done (I'd consider this article start-class at best at the moment), but certainly once these are addressed it can be renominated. Daniel Case 07:28, 10 May 2007 (UTC)