Talk:Snap music
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
Snap music is within the scope of WikiProject Music genres, a user driven attempt to clean up and standardise music genre articles on Wikipedia. Please visit the project guidelines page for ideas on how to structure a genre article and help us assess and improve genre articles to good and 1.0 standards. | |
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the assessment scale. | |
 |
This article is part of WikiProject Hip hop, an ongoing effort to improve articles related to hip hop culture and hip hop music. The goal of the project is to bring this article, along with all others to featured status. If you have any questions, concerns or wish to participate you can visit the main project page here. | |
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the Project's quality scale. See comments | |
 |
This article was nominated for deletion on 14 March 2008. The result of the discussion was Keep. |
Contents |
[edit] laffy taffy
i fixed the link to laffy taffy because it linked to the actual candy
[edit] This is not a genre
These are songs that feature snapping. What the hell. I bet you a million dollars we'll see "clap rap" real soon. --Macarion 01:15, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
-
- The question is will we ever notice it? most sourthern rap sounds the same, tired ass rhymes and uber repetive beats. I think the ying yang twins started Whisper rap, and them franchise boys started the repeat myself in a chorus over and over rap —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 75.15.234.32 (talk) 03:55, 3 January 2007 (UTC).
- "Clap rap"... Is Hand Clap close enough? -Mysekurity 06:03, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] 12 bar blues?
besides from being "simple", what is the relation between 12 bar blues and snap? also, how are snap and reggaeton beats "versatile"? this all strikes me as POV and original research.
i flooded the thing with citation needed, i dont know if thats the best course of action. i didnt want to just delete the thing outright, because if it can be clarified and sourced, it is an interesting point to make. still, for the time being it strikes me as sort of random and one person's opinion.
[edit] General article quality
Aside from blatant original research, there is a great deal of unsourced content, and alot of informal and noticeably unencyclopedic terminology. While a valid concept for an article, it definitely could use some serious cleaning up. 1337wesm 01:28, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
-
- You may have caught it in the middle of some vandalism. The article is typically hideous, but during this period it was unbearable. Eli lilly 01:44, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Web sites
Are there any websites that focus only on this genre? Peecee1978 (talk) 05:30, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
