Talk:Snaefell Mountain Railway

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	This article is a historical trams article within the scope of WikiProject UK Trams, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of trams and tramways around the United Kingdom. For more information, visit the project page, or sign up here and contribute to one of the many articles within this project's scope.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale. [FAQ]

	Trains Portal Sel week 20, 2006 This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale. (assessment comments)
Low	This article has been rated as low-importance within the Trains WikiProject.
	This article is within the scope of WikiProject UK Railways.

	Snaefell Mountain Railway was one of the good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones Date Process Result October 23, 2005 Good article nominee Listed April 6, 2007 Good article reassessment Delisted Current Status: Delisted good article

[edit] Grade?

What is steepest grade of this line?

Syd1435 23:01, 2004 Nov 7 (UTC)

[edit] GA Re-Review and In-line citations

Members of the Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles are in the process of doing a re-review of current Good Article listings to ensure compliance with the standards of the Good Article Criteria. (Discussion of the changes and re-review can be found here). A significant change to the GA criteria is the mandatory use of some sort of in-line citation (In accordance to WP:CITE) to be used in order for an article to pass the verification and reference criteria. Currently this article does not include in-line citations. It is recommended that the article's editors take a look at the inclusion of in-line citations as well as how the article stacks up against the rest of the Good Article criteria. GA reviewers will give you at least a week's time from the date of this notice to work on the in-line citations before doing a full re-review and deciding if the article still merits being considered a Good Article or would need to be de-listed. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact us on the Good Article project talk page or you may contact me personally. On behalf of the Good Articles Project, I want to thank you for all the time and effort that you have put into working on this article and improving the overall quality of the Wikipedia project. LuciferMorgan 00:32, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Good Article Review

This article is currently at Good Article Review. LuciferMorgan 11:18, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

Was delisted by 3-0. LuciferMorgan 20:57, 7 April 2007 (UTC)