User:Sn0wflake/ArchivedTalk02

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Started 21:15, 24 July 2005 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Archives

User:Sn0wflake/ArchivedTalk01, which includes messages from 16 July 2004 to 24 July 2005. Statistics for this archive are as follows: positive interaction (30) general comments (22) cricticism (6) negative interaction (4) adminship nominations (1)

[edit] Fucking Åmål

Five days have not passed... shouldn't the retitle notice still be up? WhisperToMe 00:51, 26 July 2005 (UTC)

Request closed, consensus was for the title to remain as it is. -- Sn0wflake

[edit] Sango's RfA

Thanks!

Hi, Sn0wflake. Thanks for supporting my RfA! I am honored to have your endoresment and hope to make good use of the mop. Sango123 01:28, July 27, 2005 (UTC)

It was a pleasure. -- Sn0wflake

[edit] Thanks

Hey Sn0wflake, great to see someone appreciating the work I've done. :D Yeah, some of the metal music sections are very sparse at the moment so I'm definitely looking to add some stuff to them. Midness 15:25, 27 July 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Editcountitis

Offended? LOL, I seriously doubt you could offend me if you tried. Then again, come to think of it, I'm offended you might think I'm offended by such an inoffensive comment :) -- Rick Block (talk) 19:45, July 28, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Heavy metal genrebox

User Sam Spade is attempting to change the heavy metal genrebox again. Please once again discuss the issue with him. Andros 1337 00:08, 29 July 2005 (UTC)

I replied @ User_talk:Sam_Spade#Heavy_metal_template, and will say again here that I appreciate your compromising tone, and as far as I am concerned our past dissodence is forgiven and forgotten. If your RfA was today, I would at worst abstain. You have a clean slate as far as I am concerned. ¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸ 01:26, 29 July 2005 (UTC)
I'm glad this conflict is - hopefully - finally over. -- Sn0wflake

[edit] User Tags

All over the place I keep seeing user tags like the one on this page: Rick Block (talk) 19:45, July 28, 2005 (UTC)

Now do people *really* type in [User: <username>] <time> <date> or is there some wiki shortcut? —User:HopeSeekr of xMule 6:54, 29 July 2005 (CDT)

Thanks for all the help! :-) —HopeSeekr of xMule (Talk) 13:20, 29 July 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Canderson7's RFA

Thanks for supporting my RFA and for welcoming me to the team. I'm honored! --Canderson7 16:45, July 30, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Re: Exceptional Newcomer

Thank you so much! :P It's so pretty. But, what exactly did I do? Was it for welcoming? Thanks again! Have a nice day! Ryan 22:05, July 30, 2005 (UTC)

I was just looking at that last night. I always wondered why they were called barnstars. I have no idea what enjoyment I got out of my past troubles. Very immature, I admit. Ryan 23:49, July 30, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] My RfA

Thanks for supporting me in my RfA! Thunderbrand 15:16, July 31, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Thanks!

Hi Sn0wflake, thanks for the comments! I am new here, and I'm having a lot of fun so far. BTW, great work on the metal band work overall! Gsp 06:14, 1 August 2005 (UTC)

[edit] A newbie's thanks

Thanks for answering my question in Talk:Joseph Ransohoff. I appreciate your insight into this. Kit 00:37:18, 2005-08-02 (UTC)

[edit] Thank you!

Thank you for your support on my RfA! When I submitted it, I was unsure of how I'd do, but the support was great. I promise that I won't do anything too stupid with the trust you've given me. humblefool®Deletion Reform 19:09, 2 August 2005 (UTC)

P.S. Stop by Wikipedia:Deletion reform!

[edit] Barnstar

Sn0wflake, I hereby award you the Working Man's Barnstar for your hard work wikifying, cleaning up, categorizing, and doing other tedious work that we really need around here. I really appreciate your hard work. Thanks! — Stevey7788 (talk) 23:12, 4 August 2005 (UTC)

I truly appreciate the recognition! -- Sn0wflake
You're really welcome. :) — Stevey7788 (talk) 03:28, 5 August 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Opeth Fix

Why did you revert the spacing I did for the Opeth albums? If three of them have dashes between the album title and the year, why not all of them?

PS, as a new member, i'm using this because it seems like it's purpose is for communication between the various editors. If it's not, show me how I should do it and I'll apologize. (User:TuckerIsGod)

Replied -- Sn0wflake

[edit] User E tac

User:E tac seems to enjoy vandalizing wikipedia articles, especially Slayer, Symphony X and Megadeth, but some others too. I've warned him in his talk page but it seems it wasn't enough. Should he be banned? I haven't found the place where to report users for this behavior, so I thought about posting it here since you're an admin and have reverted at least one of his vandalisms... You can reply me here since I have put this page on my watchlist Rbarreira 13:27, 5 August 2005 (UTC)

Thanks for your reply on my talk page, I hope your action towards the user works :) Sorry about the "heated" message I left on his talk page, I mainly did it because I couldn't find the page where to report vandals (thanks for telling me that too) and he was starting to seriously piss me off. Regards - Rbarreira 01:03, 6 August 2005 (UTC)

Well, it seems that your warning wasn't enough, he's still vandalizing wikipedia pages... Regards - Rbarreira 12:49, 22 August 2005 (UTC)

Thanks a lot for your fast action and reply on my talk page :) Rbarreira 21:59, 22 August 2005 (UTC)

[edit] In RE: "Warning"

Removed your message from my discussion page, as it made no sense, is self-contradictory, and meaningless. If "civil discussion" is your modus operandi, why did you revert my edit on the Tiamat band page to your version, which was rife with spelling and grammar errors, as well as factual inaccuracies (without bringing it to the discussion board first)? Danteferno 16:08, 6 August 2005 (UTC)

Issue resolved. -- Sn0wflake

[edit] Thanks for your support

Thank you for supporting my recent RfA. I was surprised and humbled by the number of positives votes. I'll be monitoring RfA regularly from now on and will look for a chance to "pay it forward". Cheers, --MarkSweep 02:10, 7 August 2005 (UTC)

[edit] New Pages

Hey, I was wondering if you could tell me what non-admin do with new pages which have been created for pure vandalism, or are blank? Should we add a template, or add them to a list somewhere? Thank you --FireFox 14:27, 7 August 2005 (UTC)

Thanks for the reply. Know what to do now, cheers --FireFox 14:45, 7 August 2005 (UTC)

[edit] RfA

Thank you for supporting my RfA. I will do my best to serve the Wikipedia community as an administrator. Flcelloguy | A note? | Desk 20:33, 8 August 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Juxtaposition

I don't think the page as you left it is actually a disambiguation page; see my edit summary.

In apparition, the part about an act or instance of appearing should not be just one item in the list; it's general (I've taken care of it). Michael Hardy 23:39, 9 August 2005 (UTC)

[edit] My RfA

Just a quick note to thank you for your support - It's nice to know that I'm respected by valued and prolific editors such as yourself. Thanks again and happy editing, Slac speak up! 22:10, 11 August 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Le noir faineant

Hmmm... it would probably be a surprise to an innocent reader if they find themselves redirected to Richard I with no explanation. I'll add the pseudonym to the Ivanhoe reference in the article, although that's still not immediately obvious (see the project's instructions). That's not much better than the original stub. What do you think? David Brooks 04:01, 14 August 2005 (UTC)

Actually, it would probably be better as a redirect to Ivanhoe. But hardly worth bothering with either way. David Brooks 05:22, 14 August 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Archive Indexer

Hey! Just wanted to show you the C++ program I did over the weekend. It takes a formatted archive (in this case Categories for Delete) and transforms it via regexs into indices sorted alphabetically and chronologically. This was partly (e.g. just alphabetically) done before, however it hadn't been maintained for several months. The lists are over at

The master list is over at Wikipedia:Categories_for_deletion/Archive_debates.
– HopeSeekr of xMule (Talk) 04:41, 14 August 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Thanks for your support

I'd like to thank you for your support on my RfA, I will do my very best to live up to your vote of confidence and help keep Wikipedia running smoothly! -Loren 01:08, 18 August 2005 (UTC)

[edit] LP Article

Thanks for your contribution to my article. I checked and the image you removed is from Laxius Power (copyrighted LP) so there is no reason to remove it. - Woodchuck96

[edit] Fernando Rizo's RfA

Thanks so much for supporting my RfA, Sn0wflake; I was promoted last night. I appreciate your confidence in me. Fernando Rizo T/C 18:34, 20 August 2005 (UTC)

Me too, thanks for your show of support and kind words at my request for adminship. :) Coffee 08:39, 25 August 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Possible linkspam

Hi Sn0wflake,

Could you please check this: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&target=66.68.135.143

The linked site isn't very great, but I guess one link on one of the article pages would be acceptable. However the anon user has added the link to multiple pages and at the top of other links (is there a policy on this?). Is this a linkspam and what should be done?Tkalayci 21:13, 21 August 2005 (UTC)

Replied -- Sn0wflake

[edit] Speedy deletion reminder

I agree with your argument that directly converted PNGs of JPEG originals are useless. Not because they look worse (they look exactly the same), but because they take more space.Sometimes, however, you want to use a graphic that would have been perfect for PNG, but all you have access to is a JPEG version. Some editors then clean up the JPEG artifacts and store the result as PNG, which may well look better and use less space than the source JPEG. In those cases, you do want to keep the PNG. Rl 19:51, 24 August 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Scimitar RfA

Thanks for the trust that you're placing in me. It goes without saying that if you have any issues with my actions (regardless of whether this RfA succeeds or fails), I'd like to hear from you. All the best. --Scimitar parley 18:46, 25 August 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Template protection

Thanks for your comment. The en-4 template was also vandalized. I'd appreciate if you can protect it (and the other en-templates, too), at least temporarily, until consensus re. protection can be achieved. Thanks! --Janke | Talk 21:15:37, 2005-09-02 (UTC) (PS: There apparently was an edit war over the exact phrasing of the en-4 template...)

Thank you ever so much, much appreciated. --Janke | Talk 21:37:50, 2005-09-02 (UTC)

[edit] Wikifan comment

(from the robchurch RfA) - > You were not promoted because you have close to no experience and interaction on the project, that's it.

I just felt that this comment could have been better - i.e. you catch more flies with honey, as they say .

Take Care!

Ryan Norton T | @ | C 22:10, 2 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] About my RfA

Hi Mark. You chose to abstain on my RfA, but I appreciate the fact that you made your concerns public and chose to take my side on a few of the issues. I just would like to assure you that I will still work my best on Wikipedia, in order to prove wrong any fears you may still have about me. I also hope this hasn’t put you in a bad position towards Silsor. Best regards, Sam Hocevar 08:55, 4 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Neopets/AntiNeopian Link RfC

Hey there! I put up an RfC on the Antineopian link thing for Neopets, but there doesn't seem to be anyone looking at it.... Could you please check and see if I made a mistake or put it in the wrong place? Thanks if you do! :) AySz88^-^ 00:55, September 6, 2005 (UTC)

Thanks for the quick response! Thank you for the suggestion; I don't know of many other editors, unfortunately, but you're right about giving it more time. Thanks again, AySz88^-^ 01:12, September 6, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Thanks

Thank you for correcting falacious and slanderous vandalism to my talk page. I honestly do not know what to do about Steve espinola :-/ All I did was revert several hundred of his vandalisms to the cleanup process about a month ago and now he's just outright attacking me. Is there a way to limit him — only — from editing my page or is this not possible in the site's current implementation? — HopeSeekr of xMule (Talk) 16:27, 6 September 2005 (UTC)

I just realized that you apparently blocked him for 48 hours. THIS IS NOT ENOUGH!! This guy has been vandalising every thing willmcw, myself, and a handful of others have edited for about a month. He has been banned for a week prior, and all of his known (9 last time I counted) sockpuppets were deleted. I simply do not believe 48 hours is enough and he has shown time and again that after administrative punitive actiosn his behavior further degrades, becoming more juvenille and sinister. That said, I don't know what can be done short of blocking an entire IP range, but he seems so fanatical that even that would just unleash a killer (I hope he lives in another country :O — 16:41, 6 September 2005 (UTC)
FYI, I had previously placed an indefinite block on Steve espinola (talk · contribs) and Steve Espinola (talk · contribs) on account of being abusive and fraudulent sock puppets of Jonah Ayers (talk · contribs). (Fraudulent because a different editor involved in his topic is named Steve Espinola IRL). I left Jonah Ayers unblocked because that was the least-misleading of his active accounts. The editor's newest account is Walter L. Newton (talk · contribs). This editor really needs to use only one account, and it should be one that isn't misleading. In any case, I'd appreciate another admin's involvement or perspective. Cheers, -Willmcw 09:55, September 7, 2005 (UTC)

Heh, you made me smile with your comment on the RFA. of course you're the chief! -- (☺drini♫|☎) 04:47, 8 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Recital

Your reversal caused a circular redirect. Clicking on Recital (music) just redirected back to Recital. Don't worry though, I reverted back to my last edit. I suggest that if you really want the article at Recital (music), you also change all the other articles (both present and future) which will link to Recital. -Acjelen 03:55, 8 September 2005 (UTC)

I don't think there needs to be a disambiguation page at all. I put the tag there in case someone insisted on mentioning other uses of the word. We can take it out. -Acjelen 04:07, 8 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Joolz's RFA

Hey Sn0wflake, thanks for your vote on my recent RFA, your support was appreciated :) -- Joolz 11:32, 9 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] RfA

I'll try a special one for you:

Ahoi, aleae iactae sunt, this user is now an admin', muchas gracias pour votre Unterstützung bei meiner Kandidatur, je suis très heureux, gracie, obrigado... I'll try to be good Lectonar comhra

[edit] Thanks!

Thanks for your support in my recent RFA! All those extra buttons might not be a big deal, but getting all this positive feedback sure is, please let me know if you have any problems or comments regarding how I use all these shiny new levers and cranks! Rx StrangeLove 00:23, 13 September 2005 (UTC)

Thank you for your kind support of my recent nomination on RfA. Best regards, RobertG ♬ talk 11:55, 30 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Planescape : Torment

Hi. I couldn't help noticing that you reverted my comment to Planescape: Torment saying that fan reactions to the novelization of the game have been heavily negative. The trouble is that they have, and that my phrasing was a very mild way of putting it. You can see why; in the game, it's vitally important and a large plot pointthat the Nameless One remains that way. If he eventually does learn his real name (that's never revealed to the player) it's in a very poignant scene towards the very end that essentially boosts him to demigod levels. In the book, his companions dub him "Thane" by the end of the third chapter.

You're hunting for vandalism, that's cool, but if take two doesn't cut it either I'd appreciate knowing why.

[edit] Template en-4

Hi, Sn0wflake, please see Template_talk:User_en-4 and consider whether to change "native" to "near-native", thanks! --Janke | Talk 17:42, 24 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Message

Thanks for the kudos and the flower! I think I'll move it to my User page. :) Owen× ☎ 01:48, 28 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] MailScanner delete

Hi Sn0wflake, you deleted the entry on MailScanner with the comment 'Notability not established.' I just wanted to let you know that mailscasnner is widely used (Protecting over 5 billion e-mails every week) and actively developed which is fairly obvious if you visit the projects home page: http://www.sng.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailscanner/ The main authour of the software Julian Field actually won the the UK's Unix & Open Systems User Group 2004 Award for MailScanner (see: http://www.ukuug.org/pr/osa2004-winner.html). Perhaps you will consider undeleting the article? i would like to contribute to it. Thanks Htaccess 00:05, 3 October 2005 (UTC)

Seconding the above. MailScanner is heavily used within the IT field (as per the links above). I also would like to be involved in the article. Was there a VfD link on this? Can you let me have a copy of the article as it was prior to delection? Thanks -- Mewcenary 13:42, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
Thanks for your reply on my talk page. Since posting my original comment, I obtained advice from the "Undeletion" page and subsequently created a new version of the article, and had the history restored. Until I asked, I didn't know the extent of what the original content was (as it was only visible to admins). Thanks for your time. -- Mewcenary 22:51, 7 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Children of Bodom

I, i'm the french participant of the CoB article in the french verison of wikipedia and i'm new using that site. I noticed that the picture you've posted for the CoB article is an official promo picture...so which license did you used? And would that be possible for me to borrow this picture for the french article? Because every picture i tried to put have been removed and that's the same for my other metal articles Thanks for your future answer and excuse my english. You can write me on User:Dimmu Borgir

greetings men, and sorry again but which license should i chek to make commons accept my ofifcial prom picture? thks a lot. User:Dimmu Borgir

[edit] Thanks for your support

Thank you very much for your support on my nomination for adminship. Now that I have been made an admin, I will do my best to live up to the truest you and the community have placed in me. If you ever see my doing something you think is incorrect or questionable, or does not live up to the standards that should be expected of an admin, please let me know. DES (talk) 15:46, 6 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Stub question

I'm seeking technical advice. Recently I created a template and category for keyboard playing musicians. For some reason, however, the stubs in this category don't follow alphabetical order (first name or last). Do you know the extra step I'm missing? You've created stub templates, so I was hoping.Bjones 01:09, 7 October 2005 (UTC)

Thank you for your timely reply. I will submit the problem to the Village pump. Fingers crossed.Bjones 01:00, 8 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] OwenX's RfA

Thank you for your support on my RfA. Your trust in me is well appreciated. Owen× ☎ 22:15, 7 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Scottish vandalism

It appears that User:155.84.57.253 is putting a Scottish category to a lot of articles (found it first on Walt Disney, who's of Irish descent...). Since you're an admin, could you please look into it? This IP has got lots of warnings before. Thanks, --Janke | Talk 20:27, 17 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] WP:RFA/SV

Im deeply grateful for your support at my difficult RFAR/RFA. Thanks. -St|eve 04:31, 28 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Nevermore

Why did you revert my edits on Nevermore? I'm new to this.. please tell me so that I wil not make the same mistake twice.. thank you for your time

[edit] Compromise proposal on Template:Suicide

I have a possible solution to the dispute on Template talk:Suicide#Compromise proposal. When you have time, take a look at it and note your possible assent or not in the appropriate section. Thanks! — Phil Welch 22:38, 2 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] My RFA

I want to thank you for voting in my RFA even though u opposed me I understand why u did. Thanks Again --JAranda | watz sup 23:17, 2 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Sorry!

Sorry, my vote on Aranda56's RfA came out wrong. I meant, "the reasoning for the various oppose votes cast havn't convinced me that he would make a bad administrator". I apologise and did not mean to insult anyone or their votes at all. --Celestianpower háblame 18:55, 3 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] El Blockage

In my defence, can you really expect someone to lie back and take it when 3 hours of work are destroyed by someone who might as well be a vandal. They have not bothered to look at the history of the situation, they have done even bothered to defend their decison. It is even more infuriating when, afterwards, they decide that they were wrong in the first place.

It is not a "mistake", it is stupidity and idiocy. The wiktionay defintion of both words is exactly correct. There is no point, in my eyes, dressing that up. Deano 13:10, 5 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] RfA thanks

Thank-you for expressing your confidence in me at my recent Request for Adminship. The final result was 40/0/0, and my "superpowers" have now been activated. I look forward to helping out with the development of the encyclopedia. Physchim62 (talk · contribs)

[edit] Johann Wolfgang's RfA

Thank you for voting on my RfA. I realize that I have not been here long, however other users said I would do just fine as an administrator, so I followed their advice. If you have any questions please feel free to contact me.
Johann Wolfgang [ T ...C ] 01:59, 8 November 2005 (UTC)

I understand why you are opposing aswell as others, Essjay said I would do fine, and that four months is plenty. However now there is a slight chance it could fail. If it does I'll wait until I 5000 edits and six months to pass by, then I'll try again. Thanks again for voting.

Happy editing!
Johann Wolfgang [ T ...C ] 02:18, 8 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] My RFA

I'm sorry you found reason to object to my adminship, but now that I've been promoted, I'd like to clear the slate. If you have any specific issues/problems with me, please feel free to state them on my talk page so that I can work to prevent them in the future.  ALKIVAR™ 07:18, 8 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] FireFox RFA

Sn0wflake/ArchivedTalk02

Thanks for your support on my request for adminship.

The final outcome was (96/2/0), so I am now an administrator. If you ever have any queries about my actions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Again, thanks!

FireFox 18:19, 8 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Category:Musician stubs

Most stub category pages function quite well without having to use a line for every other related stub, and while I can see the need for some text, the text is getting rather long here, which is why I tried shortening it somewhat. Let me explain the method behind my madness so that I can hopefully get you to agree.

  1. The direct child categories all show up on the first page anyway, and if kept in the category text will need three more lines added for the three new child types: {{bowed-musician-stub}}, {{brass-musician-stub}}, and {{woodwind-musician-stub}}. I have added a line of text to indicate that one should use one or more of these subtypes, as appropriate.
  2. The children of {{band-stub}} don't really need to be mentioned here, so long as we make people aware that it has children. While it would be more convienient if people stub bands directly, dedicated stub sorters should be aware of that, and the undedicated ones probably won;t read the notice anyway. Furthermore, from what I've seen from by stub sotr of Musician stubs today, very few band stubs get misfiled here in the first place.
  3. {{Overpopulated category}} is a redirect to {{Verylarge}}, so all I did there was cut out the middleman.
  4. For categories with lists of people {{CatAZ}} is generally considered preferable to {{CategoryTOC}}.

To repeat, the text there is getting too long and if the same parameters are followed as before, will continue to grow even longer. It needs trimming and I think my trim is reasonable. Caerwine 06:15, 9 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Philwelch's RfA

I just wanted to thank you, first for your efforts on Template:Suicide, and more to the point, for your support of my successful RfA. I'll see you around! — Phil Welch 03:17, 10 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Slipknot protection

Saw your comments on the recent update/reupdate/rereupdate... of the Slipknot page. While I'm more partial to the "alternative" tag, I agree with you that we're reaching the point where the article could do with protecting. It's not just the genre-altering. It seems that the band/page attract an awful lot of opinions and as a result it's probably the most-frequently defaced page I check regularly. IainP (talk) 17:42, 13 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Banzo

Yes, I know. Never heard of it before, so I opened a diccionary. The discription seemed different from Saudade. And, it is not related to the Portuguese Culture, so it is "off-topic".

Banzo: processo psicológico causado pela desculturação, que levava negros africanos escravizados, transportados para terras distantes, a um estado inicial de forte excitação, seguido de ímpetos de destruição e depois de uma nostalgia profunda, que induzia à apatia, à ininação e ,por vezes, à loucura ou à morte. (Dicionário Houaiss da Língua Portuguesa)

If you read the description, and the article, you'll see that these are different things. It s interresting, as we all know very few of what these people went through... but it is unrelated. Saudade is not destructive or apatic (commonly, as a feeling everyone has different ways to express it). -Pedro 12:13, 19 November 2005 (UTC)

  • Eu dou enfâse a isto: seguido de ímpetos de destruição e depois de uma nostalgia profunda, que induzia à apatia, à ininação e, por vezes, à loucura ou à morte.

Parece que o Banzo é uma espécie de saudade extrema e não é a minha visão de saudade que é mais pacífica; ou seja, é mais um sofrimento interior que exterior (o banzo parece que tem muito de exteriorização de sentimentos de forma violenta). A verdade é que dizer: o que é rir?, o que é chorar?, o que é saudade? é muito complicado explicar esse tipo de coisas. Eu acho que o banzo deveria ir para um artigo sobre escravatura, já que muitas vezes não temos noção do que isso é, e de como as pessoas se sentiam e aí isso fazia diferença. A palavra parece de origem bantu / Angola. -Pedro 23:44, 20 November 2005 (UTC)

  • Acho que é mesmo o melhor, dado que tem alguma relação, mas não é a mesma coisa. Abraço. -Pedro 15:09, 21 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Cool about Suicide Methods

Hey, thanks for removing my addition - I didn't realize there was a consensus - Is there someway to note that somewhere so no-one else makes the same change I did? Also, are you going to remove it from the main suicide page too? Or did you just not want it repeated on too many suicide pages? Again, thanks. JG of Borg 19:22, 20 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Infobox band on Children of Bodom

Hey. I change the current_members to have all the members on one line with the
between them. I don't know why, but then it worked again! Maybe a bug in mediawiki... Bye

[edit] Re: Members x Line-up

Then why does the Infobox_band list "Members" instead of "Line-up"... ;) HarryCane 12:46, 10 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Thank You

Thank You! Thank you for the comment. I'm afraid I'm not that new a user, but at least I didn't end up messing up the article. smurrayinchester(User), (Ho Ho Ho!) 10:49, 12 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Dragonforce page edits

Hi there! I must disagree with you on the subject of the "similar bands to DragonForce" which you removed twice from the DragonForce page. Although I do realise that it is up to one's personal opinion if a band sounds like DragonForce, many listeners do indeed search for months, if not years, to find similar bands. I have experienced this frustrating search myself and as such I wish to share my knowledge with others, and those others WILL be looking on Wikipedia for similar bands. I thought I could perhaps create a new topic; something like "Bands similar to DragonForce" - the similarities within would be based upon close relation to genre which is NOT of opinion but is a question of genre. Besides the fact I searched for a long time to compile such a list, the fans of DragonForce need something like this to widen their musical horizons. Please let me know your thoughts on ways to include this information. Thanks. soulhunter123

[edit] List of fads

Please do not use/abuse your sysop privilages is order to war with me over an article - U mass reverted (without explanation) so I reverted it back - max rspct 20:59, 12 December 2005 (UTC)

You know what I mean - U made threats blah blah -max rspct 21:04, 12 December 2005 (UTC)

I think you should check your own civility - calling edits idiotic etc

How can you accuse me of being uncivil and threatened me with a block. You wrote on my talkpage "Making idiotic assumptions is bad,.."

Yet you blocked User:Djr xi for saying this:

"Is "Place of origin" an acceptable compromise for the various putative idiots and non-idiots involved?"

I don't really see there is much difference/I think your being rather hypocrytical. You seem to be blocking folk that you disagree with over an article. - max rspct 15:50, 13 December 2005 (UTC)

Please listen to yourself and may I remind you : Wikipedia:No personal attacks -max rspct 21:12, 13 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Barnstar of High Culture

Congratulations, you have just been granted another barnstar! You earned it. -- SoothingR(pour) 12:27, 13 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Re: DragonForce

Thanks for your reply! I have added a paragraph on the DragonForce talk page which states:

I have, after being advised by Sn0wflake, removed my previous submissions about "Similar Bands" and instead have given informaton on Dragonforce's own self-glorifying genre, "Extreme Power Metal". This does seem to abide by NPOV rules as it is factual. Also the "Evolution of Sound" section was subject to vandalism, but as it stands currently, it is quite factual. If we cannot use even the slightest bit of description in articles then there won't be much information to go on Wikipedia! For example, saying they create a bombastic sound, as it states, is in my eyes acceptable as it is factual since Dragonforce are hardly melancholic. I do realise the rules of NPOV, however, and should this debate be carried on then so be it! However please do not outrightly revert the page as many small re-phrasing of sentences have been done by me to give the article a higher standard of English (eg. the image caption.) Thanks! --Soulhunter123, 13 December 2005