User talk:Smashlynn

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Notability of Thomas Warinner

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Thomas Warinner, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Thomas Warinner seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Thomas Warinner, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 05:01, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy deletion of Thomas Warinner

A tag has been placed on Thomas Warinner requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 02:16, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Thomas Warinner

Hi. This page has now been deleted for the third time. I think you misunderstand the purpose of Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not MySpace and as such is not there to drum up excitement for up-and-coming talents that have yet to be noticed by mainstream press. In particular, all content should be attributed to a reliable published source and all indications are that no such coverage exists for Warinner. I have now protected the page against recreation. If you feel that this decision is incorrect, please see the details of the deletion review process. Thank you, Pascal.Tesson (talk) 02:39, 1 April 2008 (UTC)