User talk:Sloth monkey

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

L _ N _ U:SM / Tm / Ti / SO / C _ A:RK / A:FOL / A:J _ UT:SM / 1 / 2 / 3 || U:WJ _ UT:WJ || FOL _ T:FOL _ FOL:H

mark of the monkey
mark of the monkey
Please leave a new message.
the sloth_monkey

Contents

[edit] User comments

[edit] Phil Schneider

Sloth Monkey,

I just learned of certain challanges to the Phil Schneider entry that were posted about a month ago. Do you want to address any corrections that might be appropriate, or should I? Thanks, LuciusMichael

[edit] ORME

Please see User talk:OlavN. -- RHaworth 13:24, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] wooooah!!!

dyude!, u sew tootally wobbed mall dis von dah perple, bewk dat vis at dah barnes! but seriousley!, who ever bought yew dah bewk me wauld mailith dem a double chilli cheese berger von HARD-E!s yep yep yep yep yep yep yep yep yep yep yep NONDE DESKA!!! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 205.56.145.36 (talk) 01:30, 24 February 2007 (UTC).

[edit] PMIDs

Please do not remove PubMed IDs from articles, as you did with DNA these are a useful part of references. TimVickers 15:46, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

That was a misunderstanding. An editing conflict occured and erased changes that I was oblivious to. Just trying to make a minor change. Linked some words to wiki articles. sloth_monkey 06:32, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] License tagging for Image:United States Of Europe Poster.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:United States Of Europe Poster.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 12:07, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Wassup d00d

Hi User:Sloth monkey, I noticed you archived an interesting article relating to the so-called Flower of Life geometric pattern. You will undoubtedly be cognisant of the connection between that geometric pattern and the Time Cube 4-corner creation principle.

May I enquire: do you approve of the notorious and persistent censorship and suppression of the 4-corner harmonic Cubic truth that has occurred within the scope of the Time Cube article and other related articles, on a nearly-continuous basis since late 2003? More Wikipedians should revolt against the Cubeless tyranny that enslaves this website. Do you think that Jimbo Wales might be a 1-corner Cube-hating singularity overlord?

—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 211.28.8.20 (talk) 06:12, 27 March 2007 (UTC). —User identified as Suring!

who are you? i immediate suspicion is that you are suring. ..however your message was much more coherent than normal suring ramblings. but i suspect this may be a ploy by the devious suring to deceive me. ...your IP resolves to sunax7-b020.dialup.optusnet.com.au, which I believe means you're using a dialup connection in australia. ........WHO ARE YOU!?! ps. Yes. I think that Jimbo Wales might be a 1-corner Cube-hating singularity overlord. sloth_monkey 20:24, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
Sloth monkey, no I am not acquainted nor associated with this "Suring" character to whom you refer--but in fact, I am a proponent of NATURE'S HARMONIC TIME CUBE principle, expounded on such websites as TimeCube.com and CubicAO.tk.
Yes I think we should probably be suspicious of Jimbo Wales. Perhaps he has had a hand in the anti-Cubic conspiracies that have arisen on this site. And indeed, Nature's Harmonic Time Cube is the key, the agent and the pathway that shall lead us to human salvation.
You're so full of it. crazy suring bastard. sloth_monkey 21:00, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Mfkzt

"Somebody wrote about it on the web" is not adequate. Please cite sources published by a third party. IPSOS (talk) 03:27, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Jota

Hi. Regarding User:Sloth_monkey/Jota_(Freemasonry), you claim "various Masonic reference works which may be found in public libraries" but do you actually have specific sources? As it is now, only Maxwell is a reference. I have yet to see The Illuminati by Chris Everard--have you? -Eep² 03:56, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

I cited my direct source of the material which was Jordan Maxwell, a historian, speaking in the video titled The Illuminati. Yes I have seen the video. --sloth_monkey 20:42, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
Er, no. I mean, have you researched the "various Masonic reference works" or did you just take Maxwell's word for it? A single source is what's referred to as an primary source, and is not considered a reliable source. I'm not trying to come off negatively, as I am genuinely interested in Maxwell's work--I have edited his and other related articles a lot lately, and have come under fire from other wikipedians/admins regarding Wikipedia policy. If you want the article to have a chance of being restored, you'll need to find more reliable sources. Keeping deleted content on a user page (or subpage) is against Wikipedia rules--I recently had my user page deleted for that very reason (see User_talk:Eep²#Userpage), so this is just a friendly warning that your subpage may be targeted for deletion (not by me though). Also, do you have a link to the video? -Eep² 08:30, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
Here's The Illuminati Vol. 2 on YouTube. I believe the video with Maxwell is in Volume 1. Volume 1 can probably be found on ISOhunt, using uTorrent client software and the BitTorrent network. No I haven't checked into this Jota thing at all other than what Maxwell said in the video. sloth_monkey 03:39, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Spam in Idealogue

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Idealogue, by DarkAudit, another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Idealogue is blatant advertising for a company, product, group, service or person that would require a substantial rewrite in order to become an encyclopedia article.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Idealogue, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. This bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Idealogue itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. Thanks. --Android Mouse Bot 2 03:14, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Flower of Life

Hi,

I am rather new to adding information to Wikipedia, so please forgive me if I do not, or have not followed the right protocol.

I note that you have amended the corrections that I added to this page in the light of the photographic evidence that I have in respect of the Flower of Life pattern in the Osirion.

I am happy to make this photograph more widely available and am looking at the moment to try to get it fully enhanced so that the text can be deciphered.

There is no doubt that the text is Ancient Greek and possibly Archaic Greek. The text is also clearly in the same coloring as the FOL patterns, of which there are at least 5 major circles plus some smaller symbols.

It seems to me strange therefore that the statement "The FOL symbol is thousands of years old" should be allowed to stand unqualified. Rather than the factually correct statement that I amended, i.e. that is no more than two and half thousand years old. We have no evidence that it is thousands of years old as claimed by some.. all we know is that it appears on the Osirion in Egypt and that the earliest possible date would be around 550 bc. Everything else is conjecture.

I would like to think that we can reach an agreement on the wording that allows for speculation but also is consistent with the facts that are known. Particularly when the footnote refers to speculative ideas that are unqualified.

If you look at my website, you will see that I am very open to "alternative" viewpoints. However I do have a problem with New Age concepts that fly in face of known facts, without any qualification or attempt to bridge with known scientific ideas.

Davidrf44

[edit] Orphaned non-free image (Image:South Park -Keith-.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:South Park -Keith-.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 03:14, 21 June 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Da Vinci Flower of Life Reference

Hello Sloth Monkey,

The reasearch you did on the FOL is far superior than the old. I've enjoyed it!

The reason I'm leaving this message has to do specifically with Da Vinci and the FOL. I'm creating philosophy on evolution and was wondering if you knew of any websites/books/info on the two Da Vinci darwings posted on the FOL page. I'm trying to get at more information, and see more drawings of Da Vinci's flower stage. Do you know of any good books/articles/info that may dive deeper into Da vinci and the FOL? I was curious on where you found those two drawings and if there's anymore information on it that you may know about.

Thanks for your time! Let me know if you have any questions?

Ecb0038

[edit] Flower of Life

Sloth Monkey,

Thanks for the response. I appreciate it!!

I found your user name when I clicked into the two da vinci flower of life images. I realized it was you after I read over your user page...

I'm currently writing philosophy of science, and your flower of life section made me aware that there was sacred geometry w/in my philosophy...didn't even realize it until I made the comparisons between the flower of life and my own geometric proofs.

Again, thanks for your help!

--Ecb0038 23:13, 22 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Geo Proofs

Hey Sloth Monkey,

Thanks for the metaphysics information! I appreciate it!

If you're still interested, I will send you a copy of the paper/book when it's complete. At this stage in the process it's so fragmented that I'm apprehensive to send anything out. The sacred geometry that I noticed when diagramming my philosophy was the seed of life, thy holy trinity, and the vesica piscis.

Thanks again for your help!


--Ecb0038 01:17, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Flower of Life: Thank You!

Sloth Monkey- I read the FOL article verycarefully and also read your debates with others in the Talk/Discuss section. I want you to know how grateful I am for your contributions to that article, your words and illustrations really gave me immense amounts of additional understanding about this symbol. I created a derivitive of it when I was a child and only recently with the internet have I been able to get the full possibilities of these geometries. Have you read Kieth Critchlow's "Order in Space"? It is awesome and though less mystical and more scientific, the forms are the same.

So, in long and short, I just wanted to thank you and say "keep up the good fight, sir!"

-Theory —Preceding unsigned comment added by Comixboy (talk • contribs) 08:06, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Check this out

I saw your tree of life image on wikipedia. They seem to like yours more than mine:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Kabbalistic_tree_of_life_plus_hemp.png

Let me know what you think. =) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.103.48.8 (talk) 03:07, 9 February 2008 (UTC)