User talk:Slipgrid

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hi --06:48, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Re:Define Islamofascism

Islamofascists are Moslems who use fascist tactics to try and subjugate us and make us dhimmis in the hope of achieving Islamoworlddomination.

[edit] Jokes

I was just kidding, and made those comments in a light-hearted way. You're obviously not going to taken away to Gitmo, are you? Cerebral Warrior 16:39, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

I'm not saying that your country (assuming your American) does not do a lot of unorthodox things in the War on Terror. But please understand the threat that terrorism poses to global security and to the lives of innocent civilians. To fight a threat so serious is the highest priority for many nations, and thus their excesses must be forgiven in light of the potential benefits of the War on Terror. Cerebral Warrior 17:03, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Accusation

Don't post this junk on my talkpage again. [1]--MONGO 05:17, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] The Craigslist Item

Thanks for passing that along. I'd say it qualifies as a smoking gun. And speaking of smoking guns, I took a look at Freepress and saw the piece where it's said a smoking gun has been found proving Iranian involvement in Iraq. Now I'm waiting for them to drag out Colin Powell so he can tell us, again, that "We know what they have, and we know where it is." Too bad the first time he said this it turned out to be one of those things that "we don't know that we don't know." Heh. Cryptonymius 06:51, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Request for Mediation

A Request for Mediation to which you are a party was not accepted and has been delisted. You can find more information on the mediation subpage, Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/September 11, 2001 Attacks.
For the Mediation Committee, Essjay (Talk)
This message delivered by MediationBot, an automated bot account operated by the Mediation Committee to perform case management. If you have questions about this bot, please contact the Mediation Committee directly.
This message delivered: 04:16, 6 December 2006 (UTC).

[edit] Cooperative Research timeline at 911 attacks article

Please assent or dissent to mediation in the 911 external timeline link matter. [2] Thanks.

[edit] Talkpage

Don't post to my talkpage anymore. ever.--MONGO 15:59, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

Don't post your POV to Wikipedia anymore. ever. —Slipgrid 16:15, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] WP:CIV, please

Comments like this don't help an already touchy situation. Raymond Arritt 16:00, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

He deserves everything he gets. When he has to delete messages from his own talk archives, something is amiss. Mongo is the best example of everything that is wrong with Wikipedia. If he can't answer simple criticisms, but can only delete them instead, then he gets no sympathy from me[3]. Asking questions is civil. Deleting the questions, because you want to continue to introduce POV into articles is not civil. —Slipgrid 16:14, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
I don't have to tolerate trolling from you. You're the one who has in the past tried to add 9/11 conspiracy theory nonsense to this website...you show up after no recent edits twice in the past couple days to harass me at my talkpage. I don't have to put up with that and I won't.--MONGO 16:29, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
I stopped contributing because of people like you. You are the worst of the worst. I am not a troll; you are worst than a troll. —Slipgrid 16:39, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Personal attacks on other editors

Regarding this edit:

Please do not attack other editors, which you did here: User talk:Tom harrison. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --MCB 01:02, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

Yup.Proabivouac 04:39, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
Point taken. I'm just not happy with some of his edits, and didn't have time to explain. But, I'll never do it again. -Slipgrid 23:07, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Change Title

Request for change in consensus: Change title to "Franklin Coverup Incident"

"A small group of editors can reach a consensual decision, but when the article gains wider attention, others may then disagree. The original group should not block further change on grounds that they already have made a decision. No one person, and no (limited) group of people, can unilaterally declare that community consensus has changed, or that it is fixed and determined."

The existing title is, in the opinion of many who have commented (Gyrofrog, Awfultin, Wayne, Tom1976, Conexion, Apostle 12), fatally biased. To start out saying that the subject material is a "hoax" is indefensible, especially when that point of view is hardly universal. A specially called county grand jury used the word "hoax;" that is all. And there is ample reason to believe that those who comprised the jury had a vested interest in protecting local people.

Request for Comment: Change title to more neutral "Franklin Coverup Incident" —Preceding unsigned comment added by Apostle12 (talk • contribs) 01:55, 30 January 2008 (UTC)