User talk:SlimVirgin/Archive 14

Education is the ability to listen to almost anything without losing your temper. — Robert Frost

Wikipedia:policy enforcement log

More people are starting to use it. Thanks for your support when I created the page. And Ta Bu was right after all. There was no need to protect it. -- Uncle Ed (talk) 02:02, Jun 27, 2005 (UTC)

Template:Guideline1

The above template has been deleted, as per WP:TFD. However, I have userfied it to User:SlimVirgin/Guideline1, where you can feel free to work on it as you please. I think that the main concern is that it would be a template fork, which is (as far as I know) not what you intended.

Warm regards, Frazzydee|✍ 02:21, 27 Jun 2005 (UTC)

New?

I'm new, could you please give me some hints? Erik Nikel

What?

Why did you threaten to block me? And why do you insist on calling me Eyeon? LittleRedRidingHood 28 June 2005 10:00 (UTC)

RfA thanks

Thanks again. The process was relatively painless, due in part to your excellent advice. Thanks, too, for maintaining the page, vote count, etc. Cheers, -Willmcw June 28, 2005 19:24 (UTC)

Picture Vandalism

Hello again. More vandalism this time concerning anon IP 63.200.164.30 (talk · contribs) wanting to replace images in certain articles with a picture of his "private part" called picture11.jpg. He uses excuses such as "typo" and "rv" to support this vandalism. Please ban him as this is clear vandalism. Thanks. --Anonymous editor June 28, 2005 20:34 (UTC)

Blocking Bias

I request you to refrain from blocking people just because they do not conform to your Point Of View. It is not a very healthy thing to do. I have observed that all blocking requests to you come from one or two editors, whose editing history indicates a full time devotion to promotion of the POV of a particular ideology, and who confront and talk rudely to anyone who attempts to make these articles NPOV. 130.203.202.156 29 June 2005 00:48 (UTC)

This anon IP user 130.203.202.156 (talk · contribs) is user:Deeptrivia who is being routed through Penn University as a proxy and the reason he/she was banned was because of vandalizing my and user:Mustafaa's user page and other articles. He/she admits that " My IP is 130.203.202.156 Thank you. deeptrivia 29 June 2005 02:53 (UTC) " near the bottom of this page here [2] when arguing against user:Axon. Hope this helps SlimVirgin. :) - Anonymous editor June 30, 2005 01:16 (UTC)

The idea is to spam the Wikipedia system by cooperating with a group of likeminded users. This makes the outcome of an editing dispute a tug-of-war: the group with most members online will win an editing controversy. It seems especially the islamic activist members of Wikipedia, like user:Anonymous editor, user:Yuber, user:BrandonYusufToporov and user:Mustafaa, know how to exploit this Wikipedia policy weakness. By the way, I did not use a proxy from Pennsylvania university, as I told you by e-mail before anyway. OK, I'm a kafir,I know :)--Germen 1 July 2005 14:47 (UTC)

Vandalism

So it's alright for FOC and JS to post anti-China and holocaust-denial crap here, but it's wrong for me to get rid of them? These people are associates, maybe even the same person, and vandalise articles with masses of crap that are just outright wrong and negative. They hate China, and try to present my country negatively to encite hatred, they also post opinionated crap that does not belong to wikipedia, under the guise of a 'review'. If you block me, you should block them as well, otherwise you're just another associate of them.--211.30.211.93 29 June 2005 04:38 (UTC)

(To 211.30.211.93) Hi, first of all, you should create account, or at least sign all your comments. I'm very happy that you have a different opinion, but you MUST express your valuable opinion per the official rules. I have a personal opinion that Mao and Stalin are the worst evils in the world history. Hitler is still evil but he is nothing comparing to them. I think you have a different POV, so you MUST cite why Mao is not the worst evil of the earth. The citation must be from credible sources, such as Foreign Affairs or Foreign Policy or anything widely distributed. You can also cite something from Ph.D or equivalent, or anything credible. But you MUST NOT include your opinion even if you believe your opinion is absolutely right.

Also, as all the other people told you, don't commit any personal attack of all kinds.

I hope this helps you, and I welcome you if and only if you follow all the regulations.

--Flowerofchivalry 29 June 2005 06:43 (UTC)

(To FlowerofChivalry) Um, it is a wikipolicy that you need NOT create an account, nor should "registered" users disparage "unregistered" users. Read the policy please. As for your understanding of NPOV, it is still lacking. You obviously have not read the examples I provided: Mao and Stalin and Hitler and Tojo and Hirohito are evil, that is a fact. As for who is more evil than the other, it can never be convincingly proved, so any claims that someone is MORE evil than another is POV. Also, sources need not be from Ph.Ds. Witness accounts, for example. They need not be a Ph.D to testify in court. Or be included in wikipedia, for that matter. Oh and I suggest that YOU follow all the regulations before you demand others do. Take for example, 3RR. -Hmib 30 June 2005 00:45 (UTC)

Vandalism

User 211.30.211.93 left the following comment at my talkpage.

So what the Japs did in China are all 'assumptions'? And there's alot of 'evidence' from nwo-Nazis on that the Holocaust never happened. Why don't you include them as well?

This is clearly a personal attack and racist attack. This user has been warned many times. I hereby request you to block this anon IP user. Flowerofchivalry 29 June 2005 06:05 (UTC)

The word "Jap(s)" has been used as a disparaging name, so the above comment is a racist and personal attack. Please block 211.30.211.93. Thank you. Flowerofchivalry 29 June 2005 06:18 (UTC)

Thanks for your help. Flowerofchivalry 29 June 2005 06:29 (UTC)

Slim, I'm sorry but 211.30.211.93 has reverted several of the aforementioned articles again. This is the third time he/she has done this - I believe you said the last warning you have was going to be the final one. Please find the articles here: Jung Chang Historians Wild Swans

Please take appropriate action. Thanks. John Smith's 29 June 2005 15:22 (UTC)

No offence, but in that case why did you warn him/her last time not to do it again? John Smith's 29 June 2005 15:48 (UTC)

Ok, well I'm happy to remove words like "celebrated", etc. That's fair enough. Also, having thought about it, I suppose that she is a biographer rather than a historian. It is, of course, a slight difference but a valid one. If you don't mind I'll revert other bits of the JC article, especially as this person can't spell certain words. Thanks for your help John Smith's 29 June 2005 16:16 (UTC)

More Vandalism

Hello again. More clear vandalism. This time by 69.174.192.67 (talk · contribs) on the Muhammad article. I am sure you know how to deal with this. Thank you. --Anonymous editor June 29, 2005 18:08 (UTC)

More vandalism from same user on Islam article. I have a feeling he isn't going to stop until he's blocked. --Anonymous editor June 29, 2005 18:29 (UTC)

P.S. You are very welcome (for the barnstar). --Anonymous editor June 29, 2005 18:35 (UTC)

User:69.174.192.67

I beat you to it — I blocked him a minute before you did... Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 29 June 2005 18:38 (UTC)

He showed that he has no understanding of female psychology by his choice of which of the two parts of your name to question... Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 29 June 2005 18:51 (UTC)

More Vandalism

Hi again. Clear vandalism by 24.65.58.91 (talk · contribs) on the Islam article. This user has been warned before and its time he/she gets what they deserve. ;) Thanks. --Anonymous editor June 29, 2005 23:54 (UTC)

Name controversy

User:Irishpunktom is having a problem with another editor user:IrishpunkTom (note the capitalized "T") who keeps editing his user page. Can you please help him as I have no idea how to. Be warned: the latter (large "T") has a redirect on his own user page to the actual one's (small "t") so you will have to click the link that says "redirected from:". Thanks and I'm sure he'll appreciate this. And yes it is confusing...:-( --Anonymous editor June 30, 2005 02:11 (UTC)

Nice move. Thanks once again. --Anonymous editor June 30, 2005 02:14 (UTC)

Cheers, Thank you both! --Irishpunktom\^talk June 30, 2005 18:18 (UTC)

Stop stalking me

• 1) I am not user 81.15.233.3 , sorry to disappoint.

• 2) You seem to have a vendetta going against me, and keep going around reverting many of my edits violating many wikipedia rules you kept telling me I should follow , ie , using the talk page, get consensus.

• 3) I will continue to add edits to wikipedia following wiki policy , so you can continue to waste your time trying to stop me, it will be of no use. --CltFn 30 June 2005 12:31 (UTC)

68.202.96.31

Hi, Slim. You've already reverted this person's edits of Luding Bridge. After I requested him/her to bring in evidence that discounts (directly attacks) JC's views, he/she ignored it and reverted anyway. As you reverted in the first place, please can you do your thang. I don't want to be accused of being "unfair". John Smith's 30 June 2005 15:42 (UTC)

Flame war

There seem to be a lot of pro-Indian/Hindu anon IP editors on Talk: Kashmir which have a grudge against me for stopping a religious attack against them! I should be getting somewhere close to a thank you for stepping in and stopping the conflict, but editors: user:AimLess, 128.118.126.64 (talk · contribs), 130.203.202.156 (talk · contribs) are confident that for some odd reason I am a "Pakistani" simply because I did this and that justifies making attacks against me. Can you mediate and stop this dispute as they seem to be taking this to a flame war level which I have no intentions of doing. This would be greatly appreciated. Thanks, Anonymous editor June 30, 2005 18:59 (UTC)

Flowerofchivalry

If there are any more perceived problems with User:Flowerofchivalry, please let me know. (even just a quick link to a dispute or short note, anything) I'm acting as the user's advocate, for issues relating to events in China after the Battle of Nanking, and Iris Chang, etc... and I'd appreciate knowing if the user is getting into or causing any trouble. I think I have established a rapport and that I could help steer him/her in the right direction. Thank you. (I just reread this and it sounds like "I'm the lawyer, if you want to talk to him, talk to me instead", which is not what I mean. I'd just like help keeping on top of the situation, if there's a situation.) Thanks again. Pedant 2005 June 30 23:50 (UTC)

Err

Someone is playing about with my Userpage again, Can you lock it ? Thanks. --Irishpunktom\^talk July 1, 2005 00:09 (UTC)

Luding Bridge

I am not user 211.30.211.93 and I have not used any inflammatory attacks. I'm sorry for the deletion about Luding Bridge, but the issue is under discussion right now... User:68.202.96.31, July 1, 2005 00:14 I'm not him--211.30.211.93 1 July 2005 03:05 (UTC)

Question

As per Wikipedia policy, I am to maintain a neutral stance and to "find a reputable source for a fact and cite the source." Unfortunately, my overwhelming number of resources prove Jung Chang wrong on her assertations that Luding Bridge did not exist, thus making this particular source unreputable. I can delete her then. User:68.202.96.31

For the last time I am not user 81.15.233.3

You keep refering to this account and accusing me of being it.. That is not me. --CltFn 65.139.81.96 1 July 2005 00:46 (UTC)

Thanks Slim

I appreciate your support on my RFA! Lots of people to respond to :-) Ta bu shi da yu 1 July 2005 05:07 (UTC)

The Myth of Islamic Tolerance

Hey Slim. In this case, and particularly given the track record of the editor making the claim, I don't think it is too much to ask for some actual citations on this matter; please see my note in Talk. Jayjg ^(talk) 1 July 2005 06:54 (UTC)

Thanks

Thank you for the Lock! --Irishpunktom\^talk July 1, 2005 16:02 (UTC)

Arbitration committee decision

The arbitration committee has reached a final decision in Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/KaintheScion et al. →Raul654 July 2, 2005 02:29 (UTC)

Character question

Seeing as you're the only admin I'm aquainted with so far (formerly 68.202.96.31 ), I'm wondering how you can input Chinese characters into the system...thanks a lot!