User:SlimVirgin/LaRouche attacks

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Personal attacks/accusing editors of bias

Editors who stand up to the person operating these user accounts are accused of being anti-LaRouche activists, of showing disrespect to LaRouche movement officers, or of actively suppressing legitimate material. The implication is that only the LaRouche editor is capable of neutral editing.

  • 21:28 Aug 25, 2004, Herschelkrustofsky: "Bcorr, you clearly wish the article to tip-toe around the relationship between Berlet and his sponsors. Why is that?" [1]
  • 10:38, Sep 6, 2004, Herschelkrustofsky: (to John Kenney at Amelia Boynton Robinson): "This was inserted as an insult to Mrs. Robinson, who knows very well who is a racist and who is not," because John Kenney wrote that there were "frequent accusations of racism against LaRouche." [2]
  • 20:58, Sep 15, 2004 Herschelkrustofsky to Bcorr: "remove Bcorr's disrespect for Ms Boynton Robinson" because Bcorr said Boynton Robinson (a LaRouche member) was a "minor" figure in the civil rights movement. Herschel changed it to "prominent." [3]
  • 07:59 Nov 20, 2004, Herschelkrustofsky: "Slim, it would be a bit silly of you to claim that you have no axe to grind here." [4]
  • 21:48, Nov 26, 2004, Weed Harper: "I have added the NPOV tag because it appears that Slim Virgins deletions are motivated by his anti-LaRouche POV . . ." [5]
  • 01:23, Nov 28, 2004, C Colden: " . . . SlimVirgin is an anti-LaRouche activist who is looking for opportunities to insert anti-LaRouche propaganda into Wikipedia articles. He hints at his real motives sometimes on talk pages; apparently he believes that he is defending the British Royal Family against accusations of misconduct in the death of Princess Diana." [6]
  • 07:05 Dec 2, 2004, Weed Harper: "Chip, I'm happy to see you come around to balance and fairness, so late in the game. It reminds me of Charles Dickens' "A Christmas Carol."
  • 21:46 Dec 6, 2004, Herschelkrustofsky: "Chip . . . you can't just practice your vocation as a mud-slinger-for-hire here." [7]
  • 02:02, Dec 7, 2004, Herschelkrustofsky: "That category of editors "with no vested interest" would have to exclude you, Slim, as you are looking, as usual, for fora in which to conduct your anti-LaRouche activism." [8]
  • 14:10 Dec 15, 2004, C Colden: "I believe SlimVirgin wrote this story to make Wikipedia a soapbox for his Anti-LaRouche campaign, which goes against Wikipedia policy.
  • 15:17, Dec 31, 2004, Herschelkrustofsky: "Chip . . . You are yourself a "marginal conspiracist critic", who makes "hyperbolic charges" and "personal attacks;" they are your stock in trade." [9]
  • 16:03 Jan 4, 2005, Weed Harper: "Slim, you have claimed on half a dozen different talk pages that you are not an anti-LaRouche activist, but I think at this point your claim has no credibility."
  • 22:31, Jan 4, 2005, Weed Harper: "It is clear to me that Berlet is trying to hijack Wikipedia to promote his (ahem) commercial endeavors." [10]
  • 16:02 Jan 5, 2005, Herschelkrustofsky: "Slim, you . . . [confirmed] once again my suspicion that you are editing these articles as an anti-LaRouche activist." [11]
  • 01:27 Jan 6, 2004, Weed Harper: "Slim, your proposal is meaningless unless you also offer not to edit LaRouche related articles, because you are an anti-LaRouche editor."

"Slim . . . despite your protestations to the contrary, I regard you as an anti-LaRouche POV editor . . ." --HK 15:25, 5 Jan 2005 (UTC)

You are once again making a mockery of your claim not to be an anti-LaRouche activist. Weed Harper 07:11, 9 Jan 2005 (UTC)

06:21, Jan 28, 2005, Weed Harper: ". . . SlimVirgin came to Wikipedia with the idea that he could use Wikipedia as a platform to revive the . . . [Jeremiah Duggan] story. Chip Berlet was also involved in the Duggan project. I suspect that Slim solicited Berlet to come to Wikipedia as his ally. Both have made some comments that Berlet was disturbed that criticism of Berlet in Wikipedia was hurting his business . . . the article Chip Berlet has been carefully groomed and sanitized by SlimVirgin and Willmcw . . ." [12]

See Talk:Political views of Lyndon LaRouche/archive3 for missing archive discussion.