User talk:Slaenterprises

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Welcome!

Hello, Slaenterprises! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking Image:Signature icon.png or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Ty 23:20, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

The community

Writing articles
Miscellaneous

[edit] Guide to referencing

Click on "show" on the right of the orange bar to open contents.

[edit] License tagging for Image:HORNAK0035.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:HORNAK0035.jpg. Wikipedia gets hundreds of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:05, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] License tagging for Image:HORNAK0008.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:HORNAK0008.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 01:08, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Possibly unfree Image:HORNAKPHOTO0001-small.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:HORNAKPHOTO0001-small.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 20:25, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Fischbach Gallery

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Fischbach Gallery, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9502E0DA1E38F933A15755C0A9659C8B63&partner=rssnyt&emc=rss. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 04:33, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Contemporary artists

Hi Sla, I have reverted some of your additions of particular artists to broad-scope articles on painting, because of the appearance that you may be singling out specific favorites, possibly artists whose entries you have created or added to, without a rationale for their special prominence. This is not to argue their notability, rather whether they are the best or most widely acknowledged examples for an encyclopedic entry on these genres. With appreciation for your efforts, JNW (talk) 05:02, 7 June 2008 (UTC)