Talk:Slag (Transformers)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is part of WikiProject Transformers, an attempt to promote better coordination, content distribution, and cross-referencing between pages dealing with Transformers. Please participate by editing the article Slag (Transformers), or visit the project page for more details on the projects.

[edit] Added Back In "Other Uses of Slag in Transformers"

I'm not sure why this was removed, it seems to be relevant to Transformers, so I added it back in. If there was a good reason it was removed please let me know so I won't add it back in again. --The Matrix Prime 19:02, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Dinobots-spotlight.jpg

Image:Dinobots-spotlight.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

[edit] Slag (Animated)

Do we really need a section for this? The triceratops dinobot in Transformers:Animated is called Snarl, which the article acknowledges, but it goes into too much detail that is explained in the Snarl article. Do we really need a section in the article that amounts to "sorry, go to the Snarl article instead"? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.151.55.78 (talk) 04:49, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

BetacommandBot (talk) 05:48, 19 December 2007 (UTC)