User talk:Skibz777

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Skibz777, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! --Lyght 06:10, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

1 'Sock'puppet/Troma Entertainment
2 Conflict of Interest
3 Do not delete templates
4 Fair use disputed for Image:MonsterInTheClosetDVD.jpg
5 Disputed fair use rationale for Image:SupernovaRox.jpg
6 Disputed fair use rationale for Image:TheChildren1980.jpg
7 Disputed fair use rationale for Image:TromaAlbino.jpg
8 Disputed fair use rationale for Image:TromaComeback.jpg
9 Disputed fair use rationale for Image:TromaCrazed.jpg
10 Disputed fair use rationale for Image:TromaMothersDay.jpg
11 Disputed fair use rationale for Image:TromaScoring.jpg
12 Disputed fair use rationale for Image:TromaSoldier.jpg
13 Disputed fair use rationale for Image:ProjectKill.jpg
14 Disputed fair use rationale for Image:TheGloveHagen.jpg
15 Disputed fair use rationale for Image:EscapeFromHell.jpg
16 Disputed fair use rationale for Image:FataMorgana65.jpg
17 Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Maniacnurses.jpg
18 AfD nomination of Blades (film)
19 Aquacadets
20 Fair use rationale for Image:Amerikkka.jpg
21 Fair use rationale for Image:AngelsWildWomen.jpg
22 Fair use rationale for Image:BadChuck.jpg
23 Fair use rationale for Image:BangBangKid.jpg
24 Fair use rationale for Image:BarefootCounty.jpg
25 Fair use rationale for Image:Battleoflovesreturn.jpg
26 Fair use rationale for Image:Beware!Children.jpg
27 Disputed fair use rationale for Image:BloodHookVHS.jpg}
28 Fair use rationale for Image:BronxEmp.jpg

[edit] 'Sock'puppet/Troma Entertainment

SKIBZ'Z NOTE: Eek! This should be interesting...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Troma_Entertainment

I'm not sure about 'sockweed', but since we are the subject of socks, sockpuppetry is certainly a violation of Wiki.

An editor has expressed a concern that this user may be a sock puppet of 71.177.187.117.
Please refer to editing habits and/or contributions; this policy subsection may also be helpful.

Account information: block log – current autoblocks – edits – logs

SKIBZ'Z NOTE: Apparently if you edit and don't realize you're not logged in, you get put on some government watch list. Remember that, kids!

Oh yeah, you violated these things too. And by that, I'm 'politely' telling you.

SKIBZ'Z NOTE: Is it me, or is this guy kind of a...well, never mind.

Please do not assume ownership of articles. If you aren't willing to allow your contributions to be edited extensively or be redistributed by others, please do not submit them. Thank you.

Just because you created this article doesn't mean you OWN this article. The article currently in place was agreed upon by a consensus of editors. That means if you want to completely change it, then you need to propose your changes on the Wiki:Troma talkpage and seek consensus through up and down votes. You can't unilaterally decide what edits stay or go. Simple as that. It's a group effort. This isn't your page, it's the communities.

SKIBZ'Z NOTE: I didn't create the article...did I? Not to mention the reason I changed a lot of it was that there was an astounding amount of factual inaccuracies riddled throughout, NONE of which were backed by ANY references or sources. However, when I brought this up with the editors, they all assured me it was ALL truth. When I asked for some references verifying the supposed facts, they said they'd get me some...that was three months ago, and I haven't seen ANYTHING since.

Please do not remove information from articles. Wikipedia is not censored, and content is not removed even if some believe it to be contentious. Thank you.

Just because you don't like a contribution by an editor doesn't mean you should delete it. Wiki is not a fan page for Troma. Both good and bad press can and should be recorded by Wiki, which uses objective journalistic standards.

SKIBZ'Z NOTE: I'm pretty sure I didn't delete anything done by previous editors...I kept all the previous information, just expanded and elaborated on it. And when I comes to reviews, I certainly look to both sides of the spectrum...it's something I like to do! ^_^

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Troma Entertainment, you will be blocked from editing.

Deleting whole sections of other people's contributions to this article.

SKIBZ'Z NOTE: Once again, I didn't delete whole sections, just expand and elaborate. This guy's just trying to pile as many violations on me as possible.

Please stop introducing jokes into articles. Wikipedia is a serious encyclopedia, and contributions of this type are considered vandalism. Continuing to add jokes and other disruptive content into articles may lead to you being blocked from editing.

Improperly sourced content like this doesn't belong, "The company is also known to steal it’s sets from the dumpster near the props department of CBS Studio."Not to mention a lame joke.

SKIBZ'Z NOTE: Although it does sound like a bad joke, it's actually one of the trade secrets of indie filmmaking. It makes sense, dunnit? TV shows use sets, then throw them out. It's kind of a waste, really...why not continue putting it to good use? I know I've stolen discarded lumber for my stupid little films...

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

You're account page makes it clear that you have a bias toward Troma. That, and your edits are clearly biased. Using phrases like, "The world worships Troma" is not only untrue but unsources, and big POV violations.

SKIBZ'Z NOTE: I'm pretty sure I never said "the world worships Troma", unless I was retarded or something. How would the Amish worship Troma? Come on, now! You're not really trying, are you? I think in an early draft, I did say that Troma was "practically worshipped by indie filmmakers", but I later reverted that.

Please do not add unsourced or original content. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.

The alleged success/fame of Troma is largely unsupported by your sources (or lack thereof)

SKIBZ'Z NOTE: Oh, yes, because we all know how successful and famous Troma Entertainment is(?). I'm beginning to doubt he's even READ the article, unless he chose to skip over all the parts about Troma's financial hardships and rejection from the mainstream?

This is your last warning. If you continue to make personal attacks on other people, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people.

You kinda sank your case the minute you started insulting other editors. So next time you feel like calling an editor a sockweed, maybe you should put a 'sock' in it.

SKIBZ'Z NOTE: Uh...aren't you insulting me NOW by saying that? I'm pretty sure telling me to shut up is a direct violation of WikiLaw #3x0267ab72. Sinkin' down to my level, eh? I don't blame ya. It's comfy down here.

BTW, Wiki has no problem politely blocking your IP if you continue in this manner.

SKIBZ'Z NOTE: You know that as soon as he finished writing this, he ran upstairs to brag to his mom about how he told me off.

What's the moral of the story, kids? It's that...well, actually I'm not sure. I guess my one mistake WAS in not bringing up my proposed changes in the 'Discussion' area, but still...at least I provided references. Sure, most of them were from Lloyd Kaufman's biography which, for whatever reason, is considered "unacceptable", but it's still better than most of the wild claims made in the current article which are backed by, let me check...oh, that's right: NOTHING. But, before I throw some kind of girly hissy fit, I'll do the manly thing and walk away. We all know that one day, Troma will get the last laugh.Skibz777 11:44, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Conflict of Interest

Dude, you are TOTALLY biased toward Troma. You know you can't do that, man?

SKIBZ'Z NOTE: Dude, man...dude!

I concur with the above editor

This is from your talk page, man!

"This is Skibz777's own personal...page...thingy. Or something. On WikiPedia, I like to call myself The Troma Guy. I am currently creating pages for EVERY SINGLE FILM made and distributed by Troma Entertainment, as well as elaborate on the pages for the films already on WikiPedia. This is all done not only because I'm a total loser with a lot of time on his hands, but as a pledge of allegiance to the greatest film studio the world has ever known."

SKIBZ'Z NOTE: Dude, man! Did I really write that, man? Hmm...I guess I did, dude. It's weird that I would say that, man, since I don't even particularly feel that way, dude. I respect Troma and all, bro, but I don't think I would actually *pledge allegiance* to them. I regret writing that, man...I was totally exaggerating.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest [[1]] This page in a nutshell: Avoid making controversial edits to articles where your close connection to the subject may cause a conflict between your agenda and Wikipedia's goal of producing a neutral encyclopedia. Please contact us if you are concerned about the content of such an article.

Dude, you close connection:"I pledge of allegiance to the greatest film studio the world has ever known, Troma."..."I'm the Troma guy."

SKIBZ'Z NOTE: Since you quoted my thingy verbatim earlier, dude, it's probably not wise to have completely PARAPHRASED that last sentence right there, man. And just because I do like Troma, man, however, not to the extent that it may appear, dude, that doesn't mean I don't have a neutral stance towards them, man. I'm aware of their flaws, dude, and have a few criticisms of my own, man. Dude, I just feel that it should be natural, man, for someone who knows quite a bit about the company, dude, to help edit the article in question, man! Dude, man, you don't have to agree with me, though, man, dude.

You are in no place to objectively weigh disputes about Troma edits, not when you worship them! You're clearly biased in Troma's favor. That's totally unwiki-like behavior, man. Cut it out.

SKIBZ'Z NOTE: Dude! What's with this whole "worship" thing, man? Why does everybody assume I *worship* Troma, dude? I like them, man, but I don't worship them, dude. In fact, man, I'm even tired of talking about them now, dude. Catch ya later, dude, bro, man, dude, dude, man, bro, dude, man, man, man, dude!

[edit] Do not delete templates

Please stop. If you continue to blank out (or delete portions of) page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing.

Your talkpage is a record of activity, disputes between editors. Deleting templates is a considered a form of vandalism. This is not a blog. The templates are there for a reason. Even if you don't agree with them, the templates must stay. Please stop vandalising this page or your IP could be banned. Thank you.

SKIBZ'Z NOTE: See, nobody TELLS me these things!!! I'm currently being watched by every internet watchgroup in America, all because I never know what the hell is going on on WikiPedia!!!Skibz777 11:46, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use disputed for Image:MonsterInTheClosetDVD.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:MonsterInTheClosetDVD.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 02:24, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:SupernovaRox.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:SupernovaRox.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:10, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:TheChildren1980.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:TheChildren1980.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:TromaAlbino.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:TromaAlbino.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:TromaComeback.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:TromaComeback.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:TromaCrazed.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:TromaCrazed.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:TromaMothersDay.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:TromaMothersDay.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:TromaScoring.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:TromaScoring.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:TromaSoldier.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:TromaSoldier.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:ProjectKill.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:ProjectKill.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:TheGloveHagen.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:TheGloveHagen.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:EscapeFromHell.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:EscapeFromHell.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:FataMorgana65.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:FataMorgana65.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Maniacnurses.jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:Maniacnurses.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 15:19, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] AfD nomination of Blades (film)

I have nominated Blades (film), an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blades (film). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 22:31, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Aquacadets

Hey, I'm a big fan of the Aquabats as well and wanted to join the aquacadets but cant seem to find a site or anything for them to sign up. If you know of how to do it will you please let me know? Asatruar (talk) 17:44, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Amerikkka.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Amerikkka.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 01:58, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:AngelsWildWomen.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:AngelsWildWomen.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 04:02, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:BadChuck.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:BadChuck.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 18:17, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:BangBangKid.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:BangBangKid.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 20:14, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:BarefootCounty.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:BarefootCounty.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 21:06, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Battleoflovesreturn.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Battleoflovesreturn.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 22:57, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Beware!Children.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Beware!Children.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 03:35, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:BloodHookVHS.jpg}

Thank you for uploading Image:BloodHookVHS.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:BronxEmp.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:BronxEmp.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 16:45, 22 May 2008 (UTC)