User talk:Sjcst

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Please do not recreate the article "infortion." Wikipedia is not the place to promote Neologisms. FreplySpang 16:41, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Molex connector. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. -FisherQueen 18:46, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] ???

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Infortion, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --GringoInChile 16:03, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

Blocked
You have been blocked for vandalism for 24 hours. To contest this block, add the text {{unblock}} on this page, along with an explanation of why you believe this block to be unjustified. You can also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list. Please be sure to include your username (if you have one) and IP address in your email.

If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia after the block has expired, you will be blocked for longer and longer periods of time.

Please do not erase warnings on this page. Doing so is also considered vandalism. JoJan 18:34, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

JoJan 18:34, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "I did not realize until recently that my editing was actually affecting the articles I thought it was just some kind of preview. I didnt know that Wiki sites could be edited so easily. If you unblock me, I promise I won't do it again :)"

Decline reason: "Per the edit listed below, please wait out your 24-hour block and edit constructively after it expires."

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

Declined per this edit. RadioKirk (u|t|c) 19:10, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image tagging for Image:Dfing.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Dfing.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 19:07, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] I should be unblocked today, how much longer do I have to wait?

That would be forever, since you recreated the nonsense article Infortion after your block expired.

It has become apparent that your account is only being used for vandalism, so it has been blocked indefinitely.

NawlinWiki 18:47, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image tagging for Image:Oldinv.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Oldinv.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 19:11, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] ???

I only created those nonsense articles so that I could print them for personal use, I knew that they wouldn't stay up. I also make real contributions to existing articles, I think a permanent ban is a bit harsh, don't you?

You shouldn't be making any nonsense articles. You are defacing wikipedia.