User talk:Sir Nicholas de Mimsy-Porpington/Archive/Archive09
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
MessagesThis is an archive of old discussions. Please do not modify this page. Archives: The Basement List_of_big-bust_models_and_performers on deletion reviewAn editor has asked for a deletion review of List_of_big-bust_models_and_performers. Since you closed the deletion discussion for (or speedy-deleted) this article, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Charlam 00 18:52, 22 December 2006 (UTC) Hi, I disagreed with your deletion of article List_of_big-bust_models_and_performers for the following reasons: Consensus appeared in favor of Keep Article is contains verifiable data Consistently in the top 50 viewed pages on Wikipedia [Link removed] CSDPlease take a look at this. Regards, - Aksi_great (talk) 19:04, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
WP:BITE
Strange pageThanks for letting me know about it, Nick. SlimVirgin (talk) 23:08, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
Restore talk page please?Hi, you recently deleted: Talk:List of proven conspiracies because of an AfD, could you please restore the talk page? thank you. have a merry christmas. Best wishes, Travb (talk) 02:59, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
Summary of your concerns - let's talk hereHi, I appreciate the discretion you used when you posted the first admin noticeboard discussion on my talk page. I just wanted to get a summary from you on your concerns. I would appreciate it if you could post them here as I would prefer to get your independent thoughts without the others chiming in. Thanks. Alan.ca 04:23, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
Your opinion pleaseNick, would it be possible for you to review the article Hamilton, Ontario and make some suggestions from a quality perspective. I have near 60 edits into the article and could use an outside perspective. Alan.ca 10:05, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
For the life of me...I cannot understand your deleting a link from the Derek Sherinian page for a YouTube video interview link. The intereview in question was SHOT for YouTube and identified as such at the head of the interview in front of all of the participants. Yet you deleted the link because of a COPYRIGHT question? We already went through this once, and you have repeated the same mistake. Furthermore, as even Jimmy Wales has publicly stated, the DMCA is the means to resolve YouTube type questions, not Wikipedia as an arbiter. And this is NOT even one of those issues, and it couldn't be more clear. The other link you deleted is covered under the DMCA, and the language you refer to I cannot find on WP:EL, although it may have been there at one point. Mr. Sherinian is very familiar his Wikipedia page, as is indicated on the Talk page, and has approved all of the outside links included. Reverted again. Tvccs 01:59, 23 December 2006 (UTC) Please stop. If you continue to remove content from pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Argyriou (talk) 02:19, 23 December 2006 (UTC) Please see my talkpage, beginning with "Nearly Headless Nick," and feel free to join in the user conduct RFC/Arbcom case which will be filed against him to desysop him and prevent him from engaging in the long course of unacceptable conduct regarding this issue. Cindery 09:36, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
Stephanie Pui-Mun LawHi - could you explain why this article was deleted please? Was there some confusion with the irrelevant Tuba article talk, or is this a precursor to eliminating all artists in the fantasy field from Wikipedia? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Inkgod (talk • contribs).
I am not a pixieI am an IRC fairy, not an IRC pixie. There's a huge difference, and I don't appreciate you changing it on my userpage, especially not without talking to me. Please don't do this again. Kelly Martin (talk) 15:11, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
Userpage SubpageYou may be interested in User:Argyriou/SirNicholas in case you have not seen it before. -- tariqabjotu 06:42, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
Meh.Boo. Hiss. Can you honestly say there was consensus for a delete and re-direct here? -- weirdoactor t|c 14:35, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
W00t on deletion reviewAn editor has asked for a deletion review of W00t. Since you closed the deletion discussion for (or speedy-deleted) this article, you might want to participate in the deletion review. -- weirdoactor t|c 01:47, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
Your block of User:MalberHi, Sir Nicholas. Since I was one of the people who disagreed with your block of User:Malber, I also wanted you to know that I don't agree either with some of the more vociferous criticism that followed the block. The policy against an admin's blocking someone whom he or she is personally in a dispute with (whether it's a content dispute or, as here, more of a policy dispute) is a good one. The other problem I had with it was that you went pretty quickly from what seemed like partly joking around ("/me desyops myself ... /me desysops badlydrawnjeff") straight to a pretty long block, which I think surprised a lot of people, and 48 hours was a longish block just for disrupting a noticeboard. But at the same time I definitely hope this user will take into account some of the comments that have been made about his questioning style. We shall see what happens; hoping for the best. Regards, Newyorkbrad 17:15, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
You are quite unclear on what constitutes "disruption" (hint: diagreeing with you is NOT it) and this makes your apology regarding the block, your "plea" to the community to forgive to appear rather, er, insincere and contrived... Cindery 09:41, 23 December 2006 (UTC) Tell you what, I'll drop the whole matter and just get back to editing if you'd drop your pompousness and sanctimony just apologize for the inappropriate and out-of-process block. Here's your chance to be civil. —Malber (talk • contribs) 17:10, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
Your block of User:Kuntan... stated: "Inappropriate username" and "Your username is an offensive slang in Malayalam". You offered no citation to support this claim. In fact, Kuntan is the name of a town in Malaysia (here's a citation). As to "sockpuppet" allegations based on checkuser results: are you aware how few IPs there are in many third-world regions, and how much IP-sharing occurs as a result? – SAJordan talkcontribs 18:08, 24 Dec 2006 (UTC).
I don't care whatever definitions exist for the word "Kuntan", he created the account for trolling and hence the WP:USERNAME was absolutely inappropriate. You can check the contents of those particular categories and the later part of my talk page to see how he continues to disrupt Wikipedia by creating sockpuppets. Also, do not come up here after receiving requests from trolls. I know what I am doing. — Nearly Headless Nick 11:08, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
Dave Gilbert (game designer) on deletion reviewAn editor has asked for a deletion review of Dave Gilbert (game designer). Since you closed the deletion discussion for (or speedy-deleted) this article, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Andre (talk) 22:34, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
Vandalism warningHi Nick. You posted a final warning about vandalism on my page. I'm mystified by this - I'm a completely responsible contributor, and have never fooled around with article content; nor will I ever do so. Comments / explanation welcome. Regards, Notreallydavid 06:28, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
Another Vandalism warningYou also posted a final warning about vandalism on my page and I don't know what it's about. Is this a mistake? It must be, but it's a little disconcerting. Do you have any idea what this is about? I can't help but be curious. Thanks for responding.---Storyliner 06:40, 25 December 2006 (UTC) Hey, and Merry Christmas.---Storyliner 06:42, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
Nick My talk has been vandledCan you take a look at my talk page please?? And this link as well http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Santa06 I believe him to be the culprit you can reply on my talk page so I se it or just dump it off my talk page or mark it as fake either way it will work for me thanks - Katie 05:51, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
George Nozuka AFDIgnoring that the article topic passed the criteria of WP:MUSIC, I don't believe that 4:3 qualifies as consensus. I think the delete should be reconsidered. - Keith D. Tyler ¶ (AMA) 06:45, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
George Nozuka on deletion reviewAn editor has asked for a deletion review of George Nozuka. Since you closed the deletion discussion for (or speedy-deleted) this article, you might want to participate in the deletion review. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by KeithTyler (talk • contribs).
I've got Your warningI've got Your warning about vandalizm. What's matter? --Arachn0 07:10, 25 December 2006 (UTC)--Arachn0 06:12, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
Agathoclea's RfA
W00t on deletion reviewAn editor has asked for a deletion review of W00t. Since you closed the deletion discussion for (or speedy-deleted) this article, you might want to participate in the deletion review. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by GRBerry (talk • contribs).
My Request for Adminship
Sir Nicholas de Mimsy-Porpington/Archive/Archive09
Thanks for your support on my successful Request for Adminship (final result 78 Support /0 Oppose / 1 Neutral) I have now been entrusted with the mop, bucket and keys. I will be slowly acclimating myself to my new tools over the next months. I am humbled by your kind support and would certainly welcome any feedback on my actions. Please do not hesitate to contact me. Once again, many thanks and happy new year! All the best, Asteriontalk 13:29, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
ConfusedHi. Thank you for your comments on my RfA. I was a bit confused by one of your comments. You state that "Also WP:BIO candidates are not speedy candidates." I'm not sure what you mean. Perhaps I misunderstand the A7 category. I would appreciate any clarification. Thanks --BostonMA talk 15:55, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
WelcomeI prefer to keep my welcome messages as non-subst templates so that I can see a list at Special:Whatlinkshere/User:Andrevan/welcome of all the users I've welcomed. Andre (talk) 19:18, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
Hinduism in India POVHi! According to me, this edit (specially Crypto-Christians) doesn't adhere to WP:NPOV. The editor had added similar stuff to Christianity in India, but was reverted. The data presented in the tables do not match with the official India census records. We can't even access data from the World Christian Encyclopedia (2001) by David B. Barrett, et al. as its not in public domain. Can you suggest stance in these controversial topics? --Victor 20:39, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
My Talk PageHello. In the future, please don't remove other people's comments from my talk page -- i'll take care of it. However, it seems as though you had good intentions, and I thank you for your concern. Just H 22:31, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
IIPM ArticleHi Sir Nick, You'd responded to a messae I'd left on User:Ganeshk talk page, regarding the IIPM article. I am quoting below: IIPM Controversy Ganesh ji The IIPM Controversy section is clearly not in line with Wikipedia:Verfiability and Wikipedia: NPOV. Please can you suggest to me how we can improve this>? Iipmstudent9 05:33, 25 December 2006 (UTC) Perhaps we need to talk on Gmail. — Nearly Headless Nick 08:42, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
Best --Iipmstudent9 05:08, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
Your congratsHi Sir Nicholas de Mimsy-Porpington :-) Thanks for your congrats! --FloNight 11:24, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
There is an RfC about youWikipedia:Requests for comment/Sir Nicholas de Mimsy-Porpington. I happened to come across it, surprised that no one informed you of its existence as of yet. -- Samir धर्म 11:31, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
A barnstar for you
Pseudo-AFD question for RfAYou have a pseudo AFD at User:Sir Nicholas de Mimsy-Porpington/Desk/AfD, that you used for posing a question in BostonMA's RfA. Another user there commented [5] that this AFD page triggered a content filter on his computer. If you intend to repeat use of the question, could you create/find some similar AFD that wouldn't trigger a content filter? There ought to be one around that is equally challenging, but doesn't trigger content filters. GRBerry 15:59, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
User talk:DmcdevitEr I think you misread my meaning and also what side in this dispute I'm on. :-) --Spartaz 16:45, 2 January 2007 (UTC) Just to be clear this is your edit that I'm referring to
Um, I'm getting stick for referring to some of those bringing the RFC as being vindictive, showing poor judgement amnd just being plain nasty. Are you sure you have the right editor? --Spartaz 16:57, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
Stupid questionI can't believe you would have created an AfD in your userspace, and then asked a prospective RfA candidate to close it properly. I admit, I'm in a quandary, trying to decide who to be more disgusted with, you for having done so, on both counts, or him for having spouted such a lot of mealymouthism in order to not inadvertently piss off anyone reading it. This, as you know, is completely inappropriate, as it deliberately bypasses WP:AFD, aka, "the proper channels". Almost worse, is your asking someone whose WikiLife, as it were, hangs in the balance, to go and "catastrophically" edit your own WikiSpace. Far worse than that, of course, is the pandering response your request elicited, but still... What on earth were you thinking?! Op'n eck fæ Påstals, Tomertalk 07:37, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
South Asian GamesWhat's the logic behind your latest revert?Shashankgupta 12:03, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for your considerationThank you for the consideration you gave to my RfA. To be chosen as an administrator requires a high level of confidence by a broad section of the community. Although I received a great deal of support, at this time I do not hold the level of confidence required, and the RfA did not pass. You were one of the oppose votes, and raised concerns. I am more than willing to discuss those concerns with you if you are interested. Please let me know. Sincerely, --BostonMA talk 03:10, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
Re : Don't Cry for Me EsperanzaThanks for the compliment! :) - Mailer Diablo 18:56, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
SpammerJust being bold. I know the procedure wasn't perfect, but IMHO these accounts are clearly only there for spamming. I seriosuly doubt this is someone who could be coaxed into making useful edits, so I didn't see the point of wasting more dev-t playing the cat and mouse game with him, waiting for him to spam before putting another warning, then waiting a bit more etc... Feel free to unblock if you think this is biting. Cheers. yandman 10:54, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
Whilst I'm hereWhilst I'm here, could you have a look at Liveandyetdie4 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · block user · block log)? This editor seems to have decided that all content she adds must bear her signature. All the filenames bear her name, and then she started inserting captions saying "photo by Alina Rucai", and now she's watermarking the bloody things! I've tried to contact her, but there have been no replies. The fact that she re-uploaded images, adding the watermark, makes me sure this person is just trying to promote herself in this way. I think the images should be deleted (I'm removing them from the articles). Thanks yandman 11:10, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
SorryCertainly didn't mean to insult anybody; it was supposed to be a backwards compliment. ^_^;; Oh well. --Masamage 17:21, 5 January 2007 (UTC) Rainbowangie (talk · contribs)I would ask you to reconsider this block. IMHO, it is far too harsh for a new user who may be unaware of how Speedy Deletion works. Asteriontalk 10:54, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
Um, no. The instructions request that you put it on your own talk page, which I did. Rebecca 11:08, 7 January 2007 (UTC) This is an interesting set of circumstances, I've added these two users to my VF userlists as well. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 12:22, 6 January 2007 (UTC) barnstar for you
Karl MeierHi Sir Nicholas de Mimsy-Porpington, If you have time and if you could on that possibility of redirecting a page without going to AfD on the talk page of this page [ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image_of_Muhammad_in_the_West], that would be appreciated. Thanks --Aminz 11:23, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
Unprotect request for Y. S. Rajasekhara ReddyHello. I don't know if you have Y. S. Rajasekhara Reddy on your watchlist, but you protected it a while back during an edit war, and an IP is asking on the talk page for it to be scaled back to semi-protect. Probably unprotect would be more appropriate. NickelShoe (Talk) 16:00, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
User:Funnypop12I've stricken out part of my comment on that user[7]. Beit Or 20:21, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
Well done mateThe way you are handling that matter reminds me to the German Volksgerichtshof in the third reich--Ekkenekepen 12:54, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
My RFACan you be a litle more specific perhaps? What is unsatisfactory? -- Jordi·✆ 13:11, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
BlockUsually I don't comment about blocks but I saw some good faith edits from 204.13.204.162 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · block user · block log). Just FYI... —Wknight94 (talk) 14:43, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
That's Me, Igor "the Otter"OK, what was wrong there? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Igor "the Otter" (talk • contribs).
Thank you.--Igor "the Otter" 10:59, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
|