User talk:Sir Anon

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Sir Anon, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ~~~~; this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! --Ronz 00:16, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] War on Terrorism

Hello,

May you indicate me what is the problem with this aricle ? (about POV I mean) because I cannot see any major conflict in the discussion. If you think that there is a problem with the article, could you please explain your position; Talk:War on Terrorism.

:)

Mrpouetpouet 18:09, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

  • Hi,
I see that you have drastically cut the infobox down to size, and I feel it is entirely appropriate. I myself have tried to keep an eye on the infoboxes of contemporary wars to curtail there being used for POV-pushing, and that article's is one of the more prominent examples. A gordian solution. --victor falk (talk) 14:48, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Joseph Stalin / Stalinism

I'm not sure I quite understand this. You reverted my addition of mentioning Stalinism by name in the intro, but you did it with the edit summary saying "rv - reference to Stalinism both significant and appropriate", which appears to indicate that you do in fact agree with my addition. — Dorftrottel⁠ 00:02, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

Ah, ok. No worries. — Dorftrottel⁠ 02:55, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] WoT

I agree to the new name of the article Combatants instead of allies, listen it was not my intention to try and push my view and come in conflict with you, also the only reason I put Allies instead of something else is because this article was already once before created but was deleated about a month ago after it existed for about 4 months. I just took the old name from before.User talk:Top Gun


[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Triangle tv.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Triangle tv.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 10:08, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Re: Image:Triangle tv.jpg

Hi! The image didn't have a copyright tag, so I've undeleted the image and fixed it up for you. You shouldn't be bothered by it again. Happy editing! east.718 at 20:26, March 6, 2008

[edit] WoT

I realy don't understand what's the problem with the infobox. It's been like that for more than four years. And it had been discussed over and over againt what should be included and a consensus was reached on numeres times. We are only debating this now because User: Willy turner was trying to push his POV on this. Again it's stupid to want references for something that is common knowledge that much that there are no references. And there are but they are in those wikipedia articles that are linked to the WoT and your statement that those are not reliable sources because the references are in those other articles instead of this one is illogical. Top Gun