Talk:Singerman list

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 WikiProject Religion This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the Project's quality scale. Please rate the article and then leave a short summary here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article.
This article falls within the scope of the Interfaith work group. If you are interested in Interfaith-related topics, please visit the project page to see how you can help. If you have any comments regarding the appropriateness or positioning of this template, please let us know at our talk page.


This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate, you can edit the article. You can discuss the Project at its talk page.
Stub
Singerman list is part of WikiProject Jewish history, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardized and up-to-date resource for all articles related to Jewish history.

If you would like to help improve this and other articles related to the subject, also consider joining the project. All interested editors are welcome. This template adds articles to Category:WikiProject Jewish history articles.


??? This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Contents

[edit] Books and Anotated bibliographies

A speeedy editor did not give me a chance to make my comment. I've written an extensive defense of the {{stub}} herein, but it was not saved, and was wiped out when the mistake {{hangon}} was removed by him/her. I'll have to write a defense a bit later - as I have to go now ... Ludvikus 20:07, 23 September 2007 (UTC)

I'm going to place Singerman numbers on the antisemitic items we have articles on. --Ludvikus 20:36, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
    * Look up Singerman 0123 (this Bingo number is a coincidence, trust me):
         (1) Click on The Jewish Bolshevism.
         (2) Click on or go to the ==Reference== section.
         (3) Now look for Singerman 0123.

Need I say more? --Ludvikus 21:07, 23 September 2007 (UTC)

I've substantially edited/improved the above. --Ludvikus 12:53, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

Latest development: Am using #REDIRECT Singerman list. Will report later on changes. --Ludvikus 12:39, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Singerman list

It is intended to list the Singerman items, by their number, on the article, in the appropriate spot, including the title, but not the copyrighted commentary. Ludvikus 06:26, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

Please do not delete the items in the list. This (article) is going to be just that: a List. --Ludvikus 00:35, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Singerman list

The above is the place to go if you oppose deletion of the Singerman list. Robert Singerman, in his useful guide to the study of antisemitism, Antisemitic Propaganda, identified, by assigning a unique 4-digit number, all the important antisemitic tracts which had a significant impact on late modern Jewish history. In fact, practically every variation of "The Protocols" (not just 1st editions) is uniquely identified, and a paragraph-long anotation is given. So please give you support this important article on antisemitism. Ludvikus 04:14, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Finding an antisemitic book on Wikipedia Web by its Singerman number

I've done that now! Will now try Google on it. --Ludvikus 12:36, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

So, if you're Googling on the Web for Singerman 0123 what do you think you Now get?
Yours truly, --Ludvikus 13:02, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
Here's an example. Suppose your interested in Singerman 0123. Just get out your Google search engine (or any search engine for that matter) and put it in quotes, like so: "Singerman 0123." Click . And vois la[sic - forgot my ]French} [1].
Need I say more? --Ludvikus 13:09, 26 September 2007 (UTC)