Talk:Simon Palfrey

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.
Start This article has been rated as start-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
This article is supported by the Science and academia work group.
Flag
Portal
Simon Palfrey is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.
Start This article has been rated as start-class on the quality scale.
Low This article has been rated as low-importance on the importance scale.
Simon Palfrey is part of WikiProject Shakespeare, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Shakespeare on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Stub This article has been rated as stub-Class on the quality scale.
(If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.)
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
Articles for deletion This article was nominated for deletion on June 25, 2007. The result of the discussion was Nomination withdrawn.

[edit] Notability

Please make a case for notability under WP:BIO if anyone has an interest in seeing this page preserved. MrZaiustalk 21:11, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

Nomination to delete was withdrawn. See Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Simon_Palfrey. -- Myke Cuthbert (talk) 16:45, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
Yup - Issue largely resolved. The more the better, of course, but I've removed the note tag and withdrawn the AfD nom, after an editor with access to private scholarly databases found some valid sources to back a case for note. MrZaiustalk 17:31, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
Yeah, I just wanted to make it clear that actions had been taken after your message so that editors didn't think that the page was still in danger of deletion (I know the summary at the top also says so, but figured better safe). Best, -- Myke Cuthbert (talk) 19:56, 29 June 2007 (UTC)