User talk:Silverscreen

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hey, Silverscreen, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thanks for your contributions. I hope you like the site and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful (some of them may sound stupid, but I recommend you check them out):

While editing, please remember:

You should introduce yourself here at the new user log. I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name, the date, and the time.

For your first edits, I suggest searching for articles that you think might interest you. You could also be audacious and try a random page.

If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome and happy editing! Cbrown1023 20:57, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Comment

Killers from Space is a little improved now, I changed it to a start class for now. It will need alot more work before the next class rating of B. RobJ1981 19:32, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Film naming convention

Hi Silverscreen, thanks for your contributions to the Film Project. Please note that naming film articles should be "So and so (19xx film)" (not movie). Cheers! Hoverfish 12:30, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Movie sourcing

Use IMDB for a source, and in most cases: official sites. But since it's an older movie, there is no site like that, so IMDB should work fine. RobJ1981 21:23, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Tommy Rall

Sorry, the only proof I have is a signed program by him and a photo will appear in BHS 2006-07 yearbook. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Teofil Bartlomiej (talk • contribs) 00:06, 10 January 2007 (UTC).

[edit] Abbott and Costello

The sites limelightmovieart.com and www.clown-ministry.com are spam sites. In addition, there were something like 8 clown-ministry entries, when the max for any sites should be 1. As for fan sites, they should be kept down to an absolute minimum. I usually go for one well-representative fan site or none at all. The baseball hall of fame link was brief and wasn't notable enough to be included. Impressionist links should never be included, since those are pure advertisement. Radio logs are available in many places, and many are more complete than the one that was included. As for app.com and the web.archive.org links, they were dead when I tested them. --PhantomS 15:32, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Bellaver in naked city.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Bellaver in naked city.jpg. The image description page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 22:05, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Kershner Films

I am sorry for the late reply, as I have been away for quite some time. The notability of those Kershner films is based upon the fact that they were theatrically released, however, I created them quite some time ago, admittedly, for the sake of the Kershner template. I'm afraid I haven't seen those films either, so my efforts would be as much use as an ashtray on a motorbike. Sorry. ....(Complain)(Let us to it pell-mell) 03:46, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Robert Benchley

Howdy! I'm going to be putting some significant work into Robert Benchley in the coming days/weeks. I know you expressed some interest in improving the article, so I figured I'd let you know if you're still interested. --badlydrawnjeff talk 18:00, 6 May 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Orphaned non-free image (Image:Meredith.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Meredith.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Dermot 15:42, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Abbott_and_costello.gif

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Abbott_and_costello.gif. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MER-C 13:15, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Re: Jack Daly

The total content of this article at the time of deletion was: == Jack Daly == Jack Daly was born in Brighton in the UK. Hopefully to make a computer company.

The Daly you are talking about is a completely different person, so if you want to create an article on the actor, more power to you! Create a stub and let me know if you need any help. Thanks for keeping an eye out, ˉˉanetode╦╩ 08:17, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

Thanks! I guess it was a bad link and an even worse article. I'll see what I can do about the actor Mr. Daly.--Silverscreen 15:58, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Something Wild.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Something Wild.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 21:43, 23 October 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Theseventhcross.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Theseventhcross.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:58, 26 November 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Valachi DVD.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Valachi DVD.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 11:25, 21 January 2008 (UTC)