User:Silsor/quotes
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Classy Wikipedia quotes
I have discovered a truly remarkable proof that Jews control Wikipedia that the margin of this talk page is too small to contain.
This is a collection of various Wikipedia-related quotes I have observed, with citations where possible. Some quotes are trimmed for clarity.
[edit] Hubris
Yes, I'll be keeping an eye on my clock for when the allotted time rolls around. I have a 5,000 page watchlist to tend to; the project can't afford to have me blocked for so long.
I'm an extremely busy person on Wikipedia, with lots of projects open. I cannot afford to be blocked for even one minute, I am sorry if I broke policy, but I feel not being blocked is more beneficial to Wikipedia. I do not have time to appeal to other Wikipedians.
Earl Andrew - talk 17:42, 2 Apr 2005 (UTC) [2]
Well, "Old Souls/Spirits" are those that have been around eons. One can usually tell an "Old Soul/Spirit" as opposed to a "Young Soul/Spirit". The latter will make mistakes the former would not likely make. In other words "Old Souls/Spirits" have learned life lessons that the "Young Souls/Spirits" have not. Through metaphysical sessions I've learned that I've had 20,487 lifetimes and 4,802 have on Mother Earth. So I'm an extremely "Old Soul/Spirit".
Bumpusmills1 04:07, 10 January 2006 (UTC) [3]
<MaruTheSandman> Ed_Poor, meh. I think you'll be back, if only because
you'll outlast all the other people.
<Ed_Poor> lol * Maru. You're probably right.
<Ed_Poor> It's only been a few weeks. My longest was 2 months.
<Ed_Poor> The place really fell apart in my absence, if I may be so
immodest.
Wikipedia will always be biased towards Americans simply becuase of the fact that a relatively minuscule number of people in the third world have the internet.
--[4]
[edit] Paranoia and insanity
BTW, I just *love* how Wikipedia has updated its anti-government legal policy ever since my questioning the Constitutionality of their "terms of use" the first go-around. Very saavy! Surely a court would not be able to convict anyone of treason based on the policy's current wording. Luckily for the oppressed and the true American patriots--those who believe in the totality of our nation's Constitutional rights for all--among this "community", I am in possession of dated copies of the Wikipedia's former, far more stringently anti-American, traitorous policy. It is funny that those who are the true American traitors--those who not only disregard our nation's Constitution, but also encourage others to do so and shun and dehumanize those who would go against the grain in upholding it--are the ones dubbing *others*, us true patriots, guilty of "treason". In fact, making the entire matter all the more ironic, accusing one of treason is in violation of your beloved "terms of service" for several different reasons. If we can expect one thing from Wikipedia, we all know by now it's not accurate and factual information; it's agenda and hypocrisy masquerading as knowledge! Those who control this project are guilty of crime on so many different levels--but perverting information and knowledge in order to push an agenda and fucking with the minds of young children all over the world, who come here in search of that knowledge, is truly the grossest of their sins!
All who stand against bias and racism must fight these despots with all our energy! If we do not win, and weed out these biased and elitist facists with an agenda, such as Guanaco, Snowspinner, Neutrality, Mike H, and others, holding them accountable for their crimes against this project's integrity and against the world's knowledge, then the future of our race will be doomed as a result of all the lies and fraud that are perpetuated by this "project"! Think about it, and understand what must be done!
--[5]
It is hereby ORDERED that any and all pages at www.Wikipedia.org that contain any reference to Sollog, Sollog Immanuel Adonai-Adoni, John Ennis, John Patrick Ennis, TOH and members of TOH be immediately removed.
It is further ORDERED that a fine of Ten Million Dollars be levied upon both the Wikimedia Foundation and Jim Wales personally for distributing knowingly this material after members of TOH had complained of being offended
It is more apparent than ever to me that those that disagree with some of the context of this article are to be denied the opportunity of editing and that the administrator(s) pretend to open this up to a forum of discussion whereby a concensus will be reached that will result in those that are not to the extreme left and wish this article to actually be NPOV will find appeasement. Rubbish. The page is protected in an effort to maintain the bad reporting and to extend as encyclopedic left wing bias and propaganda. I doubt anything disussed here will result in any major improvements to this rag of an article because the administrator(s) are hopelessly POV, anti-Bush and determined to slander his character. They impose martial law because they are unwilling to admit that their position is weak. We can argue about the situation forever, but there is no doubt in my mind that unless you agree with the major contributors of this rag you will never get appeasement. Let's not pretend to think that we can hash things out here. Open to discussion...it's like farting in the wind.
Moron...Month, you say? I did not notice. My time-sense is "slightly" distorted after my psychedelic journey through EVERNOW - I lie in bed, still, passing within Waters of Life, for 6 days and 6 nights, in total darkness, experiencing visions and thinking, thinking, thinking. It is hard to express in words. I was thinking how to save the Universe, I care about such things...Crazy things, but not nonsense. Thus "Applied Memetics" and other strange artifacts. I was experiencing the everlastng now. I was and am able to think backwards in time, for a while I even felt that the Universe reversed the direction of flow of time. I have bisarre ideas, but I also have the ability to hold belief in many, even mutually exclusive things at the same time. They cancel themselves out. So I am not exacly confused. See the site mentioned below, look at the artcle in the Drugs division, "Straszne Skutki Awarii Telewizora" - I bursted a pathetic attempt at a poem in English there, which was supposed to be a joke, but, curiouser and curiouser - it seems to have coherent narration and tells a bit about my experience (not my concious intention!). A Daimonion, I guess, wrote it.
Agquarx 00:02, 7 Feb 2005 (UTC) [9]
I request arbitration against the entire arbitration committee, together with Jimbo Wales, and the Wikimedia foundation. The latter for failing to stop the former, and indeed being complicit with it.
CheeseDreams 13:47, 13 Feb 2005 (UTC) [62]
- Having massive bais towards certain editors ([10],[11],[12],[13],[14],[15], [16], [17], [18], [19]) - the leaders of the cabal
- Failing to apply Wikipedia policies (including [20], [21], [22], [23]) to favoured editors, despite their massive violations of them (e.g. [24], [25], [26], [27], [28], [29], [30], [31], [32], [33], [34], [35], [36], [37], [38], [39], [40], [41]), treating them as if they were above the law (e.g. [42], [43], [44], [45], [46], [47], [48])
- Extreme lack of even handedness (e.g. [49] vs. [50], [51] vs. [about:nothing], [52] vs. [53]m [54] vs. [55])
- Absolutely no attempts to look at evidence for the defence (e.g. [56])
- Engineering a state of massive systemic bias towards the Christian Pro-American Right (and the Jewish/Zionist right where not applicable) (e.g. look at the list of banned/penalised users and their editing, vs. the non-banned ones, as well as the cross-section constituting the list of admins).
- Failing to recuse themselves when they have a clear bias / conflict of interest in a case (e.g. [57], [58], [59], [60], [61])
Chip Berlet is a 5 cent thug in a long-range Aristotelian network, an evil, Venetian-based clique which has found its most demonic individuals in men such as Bertrand Russell, the advocate of nuclear genocide; Adolf Hitler, a perverted figure of anti-christ calibre who was installed into power by British bankers; and the Beatles, generals of a literal "British Invasion," doped-up zombie devils whose atrocious personal lives matched the Satanic musical presentation of their pop songs.--[63]
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Adolf_Hitler&diff=next&oldid=31506325,[[64]] Massage down-grade in POV , cumulative massage,r after: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Adolf_Hitler&diff=prev&oldid=31501620 ,[[65]]. Shows typical provocative creeping Opus moderandi of POV massage. V.sad 4 WP .NO MORE EVIDENCE IS REQUIRED TO DEMONSTRATE THAT USER FK CANNOT CONTRIBUTE TO WIKIPEDIA, AND THAT WIKIPEDIA IS CORRUPTED BY CONCERTED INTELLECTUAL /REVISIONIST / GERMAN / CLERICAL DISHONESTY . FK SHALL MAKE NO MORE ATTEMPT TO EDIT TO ANY ARTICLES UNTIL THIS IS SORTED BY WIKIPEDIA. FK RESERVES THE RIGHTS TO HIS OWN CONTRIBUTIONS THAT THEY BE PUBLISHABLE FREELY BY FK HOWSOEVER HE CHOOSES. FK RESERVES HIS RIGHT TO SELF DEFENCE, AND TO EDIT TALK PAGES AND CALL FOR FURTHER ABITRATION. FK'S MESSAGE TO ARBITRATION ENDS WITH THIS TRUTH FROM[[66]]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Hitler%27s_Pope/Archive2, Adressed to Robert Mac-Le-Non McClenon I remind you that good action must not only conform to moral law , but be done for the sake of moral law . That good will is good not by what it performs but simply by virtue of the volition , and that the function of reason is to produce a will good in itself , for reason recognises the establishment of a good will as its highest practical destination .
--[67]
These websites are controlled and sponsored by Jimmy (JIMBO) Wales of the Wikimedia Foundation and Bomis.com, a porno distrbution business controlled by Jimbo Wales. Both websites are a front for a bogus 501-3(c) Charity (Wikimedia Foundation) which solicits moneys from the General Public to pay for its cost of operations and which is also used as a tax shield for Wales various business interests, including his porno distribution businesses. Wikipedia is an on line chat room frequented by sexual predators, and internet libelers and is used as a tool of libel by Wales and the Internet Community at large. The site is also used by various social and political interests which support social causes by seeding content and pornographic imagery into the site in support of controverisial topics. The site has been used by pedophiles to promote child molestation, and the gay rights movement in support of gay marriage and other politicaly charged issues. The site has been labeled a gay chat room by numerous site visitors and an on-line forum for child molesters and pedophiles. Given Wales involvement in the porno business, these types of activities are not surprising. Several links on Wikipedia link to this site with statements that this website fails wikipedia's neutral point of view (NPOV) policies. Since this website is **NOT** Wikipedia, the comments on Wikipedia's websites are somewhat disturbing. Recent allegations have surfaced that Wales has been using his 501-3(c) status filings with the IRS to engage in Income Tax Evasion with regard to Wikipedia and the Wikimedia Foundation. Allegations have also surfaced that Wales and Wikipedia/Bomis/Wikimedia Foundation are currently the subjects of an IRS investigation related to tax fraud and income tax evasion.
--[68]
[edit] Anti-Semitism
In the long term, there is absolutely one and only one solution to this specific instance of jewish bias, we must setup our own wikipedia. There is no other option - any other option is futile in totality. They make the rules at the end of the day and are not open to reason when it comes to issues involving jews and judaism. Also the elites on the existing wikipedia are an effective cabal jewish supremacists and lackeys of the jews, thus trying to appeal to open balance, sanity, fairness and neutrality will ultimately always fail in the long term regarding any issues which even remotely touch upon or involve jews and judaism. Jews are a neurotic bunch, myopic, like the child who is unable to understand how others might perceive things. They are unable to understand alternative perspectives when it comes to their sensitive subjects which can only be view, represented and spoken upon in a non-critical light.
--(WhiteBamboo on [69])
The problem with limiting the "democracy" here to active Wikipedians is particularly egregious since by the very nature of an encyclopedia we are dealing with the classic problem of holding the accountants to account. Since Jews have historically been the most specialized ethnicity in account-keeping vocations stretching back at least to the Babylonian era, any attempt at such record keeping is going to have a distinct Jewish bias to it. To have a vote on whether to keep or discard the topic of Jewish ethnocentrism is therefore inherently imbalanced and to be neutral requires some countervailing points of view. You think this is "stacking the vote". I think Wikipedia is already stacked with Jewish bias and that therefore what I did is attempting -- perhaps futilely -- to provide some balance to an egregiously biased situation. This bias on Wikipedia is, of course, no worse than almost any other aspect of civilization where Jewish ethnocentricity biasing accounting is not kept in check with so-called "anti-semitism" but it is an obscenity neverheless.
Jim Bowery 04:46, 8 Feb 2005 (UTC) [70]
Keep - I ask that the Jewish Ethnocentrist cabal, give this topic a few weeks to develop, right now this topic is in a very rough and early stage. When I say Jewish Ethnocentrist cabal, I don't mean this as a personal insult or attack against you guys. I just mean it as a factual, accurate and documented reflection of your actions, history, censorship and emotional bias regarding issues related to or regarding jews, judaism, israel and zionism. Please don't let your personal and sensitive feelings about my other contributions prevent such an interesting and relevant topic from existing and being developed. Thanks for your understanding and neutrality in these regards.
On a tangent, I think the real problem is that I exposed the absolute fact that every section regarding or even remotely involving jews, judaism, israel, zionism and holocaust denial have a cabal of jewish ethnocentrists, jewish supremacists and (neurotic?) jews, even worse lackeys of jews, who refuse to allow these areas to be fair, balanced, npov, and include legit links and sources. Even worse is that these sections will rarely if ever have the truth regarding the extent of alternative points of view which largely exist and are not pro or neutral concerning jews. By exposing this as a fact regarding wikis jew bias and jew infestation, I have brought the wrath of the jews and their lackeys, thus not ever being able to make legit contributions to wikipedia without those legit contributions being purged, deleted or reverted. Not an insult, not a personal attack, just follow the cabal and you will see I am right. ... Wikipedia works for the most part, but your jewish bias from your jew cabal (which includes lackeys of the jews as well) and the inability for the great majority of people to see there is a serious jew problem here will definitely hurt the long term legitimacy and credibility of wikipedia regarding issues involving or even remotely involving Judaism - FACT!
wikipedia has full blown Jewish AIDS and can not be cured.
--(WhiteBamboo on [73])
this article is based off of jewish hatred for black people and futhure suppression of an expediently dying race in which jews are known fore runners. American (WHITE)culture has accepted these ideologies and theories of jews as fact and have lived by them since the first jews to come hear began the kkk. They never want to hear or talk about that. The term conspiracy is also coined by them as is "the new white negro" and depicting African-American women as whores. As a black woman I've never come across these rumors at least not from the black community but whites. A study is not being done on this because it's false entirely. Just another ploy to keep stereotypes of black people intact rendering them obsolete.
Wikipedians (Jewish volunteers) will concentrate on a certain subject, and actively moderate any new replies. Once an individual edits an article, his ISP number is recorded, and he is assigned a sayanim that will monitor all his future writings. (The Sayanim is a Jewish person, that can be called on to assist another Jew in any cause.)
[edit] Pedophilia
Apparently Wikipedia works like Orwell's "Animal Farm", all animals are equal, but some are more equal than others. As usual, anything written by a pedophile (even if entirely correct, well researched and entirely documented) is subject to scrutiny and censorship by the "normal" people. I resent the hell out of this! Your UNREASONING hatred is apparent when you delete (burn a book) a well written article that relies on solid research. This stinks of Hitlerism and medieval witch burning! Shame! Shame! Shame!
--Jeffrey Gold (Founder and President of Sure Quality Internet Radio - YOUR Boylove PRIDE Station!)[75]
[edit] lol what
There is no rule against trolling wikipedia. Wikipedia needs a few good trolls to challenge some of the crypto-fascist repressive bullshit that some of these administrators liberally imbibe.
Popeye [76]
Anyone dislike the suggested pink color for North America as much as I do? I'd suggest something like below, with a buff or antique white for North America, with the Africa color darkened a bit for more contrast with the new North America color.
Kevin Myers 05:32, May 2, 2005 (UTC) [77]
On 11/17/05, Ray Saintonge wrote: > The dynamics in an organization can easily change when it has paid > staff. I very much prefer an environment where everyone is working > for the love of what they believe rather than the love of money. I don't. What your describing is a social experiment, and the sort of one I find violently objectionable. See communism. Jack (Sam Spade)[78]
Hi, Mr. Raul654. I hate to bother you at this time, but my name is Greg from the CrackTeam at CodeCentral.
You may have noticed our edits recently (we share an IP with a school, and we regret any bad edits).
These are not bad-faith edits or what we consider trolling or vandalism. They're alerts from us, the CrackTeam at CodeCentral, telling you that your site is editable.
Most editable sites have been exploited by security flaws from attackers, as some websites became temporarily by the Sircam virus.
We don't know if your servers run Windows or Linux or not. If so, they can be vulnerable to viruses (Windows more than most).
Just wanted to let you know. Editable websites are a bad thing, and spyware, adware and viruses can happen to them (but not if you use a Macintosh usually).
Thank you,
The CrackTeam at CodeCentral[79]
As this matter touches on Nuclear energy, the Arbcomm must realize that the Price-Anderson Act removes all jurisdiction on such matters to the Federal courts, accordingly, the Arbcomm has no authority to regulate, interfere, or hear disputes arising from such matters ... This venue is therefore deprived of its usual jurisdiction and required to remove the complaint forthwith.
Benjamin Gatti 03:49, 9 December 2005 (UTC) [80]
