Talk:Silent House

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Flag
Portal
Silent House is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.
Start This article has been rated as start-class on the quality scale.
Low This article has been rated as low-importance on the importance scale.
This article is supported by WikiProject Australian music. See also P:AUSMUSIC.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Knight chess piece. Silent House falls within the scope of the Crowded House WikiProject, an effort by Wikipedians to improve articles on the band, its songs, albums, and members (as well as their side projects). For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Start This article has been rated as start-Class on the assessment scale.
Low This article is on a subject of low priority within the project


||

[edit] afd

  • Keep: I created the page for Silent House as it's notable when a song is commercially produced by more than one artist, and that's the case here. Additionally, there are many individual songs that have articles created for them, in particular, many by Linkin Park and Panic! at the Disco. As it states in the WP:ALBUMS project page, pages about songs themselves are fine, but don't expect anybody else to go and create them (paraphrased, but that's the gist of it). As I've said, this song bears note due to its origins. I'm not advocating all songs ever written to be given their own page, but due to the unique nature of the song's dual recording, it's notableto be given its own page. I have only just created the page and intend to expand on the it to bring it up to a standard level (at least bring it up to start class, if not greater). I should also note that there's no specific guidelines for notability for songs and singles (see here). To prove this point, a song that only reached #28 in the charts not only has its own page, but it is given on the WP:SONGS page a guideline (see here). --lincalinca 13:44, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
Well it seems I didn't need to say all that. Irrespective, if this page's notability comes into question again, my argument still stands. --lincalinca 13:47, 30 April 2007 (UTC)