Talk:Sigobert the Lame

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] See also

Since you keep reverting my removal of it, I will explain here my reasoning. I am not trying to remove legitimate or useful links to related topics. But I think the relation between the topic should be made by its mention in the article with a link there, not in a detached section with a list. This lack of context does not immediately aid the reader and can lead to sections with unimportant links or with links the inclusion of which is not NPOV. Stylistically it is also less than optimum, in my opinion. I'd be happy to see those links turn blue from red and incorporated into the article if they are directly related to Sigobert in some fashion. Srnec 02:33, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

If this is really your point then why didn't you add a simple phrase in the text? I wouldn't mind a HELPFULL contribution. You are invited. johanthon 07:38, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

I don't understand your dispute. What is it about? Whatever you do, don't list redlinks under "see also", it's pointless. dab (𒁳) 08:01, 17 July 2007 (UTC)