Talk:SIG Sauer
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Editing
I plan on citing the sources throughout this article to get rid of the flag. I will be using the sig website as my main source just to site everything. I also belive that the history part could be split into multiple sections. In my opinion I believe that there should a part dedicated to the history before Sig moved to the United States and a part dedicated to after their move. Some of my peers believe that the history section is kind of overwhelming with all the facts there so I think this could be solved with a split. My main goal however will still be to make the page better. I have added the logo to the page and wish to get rid of the flag and possibly make it easier for the reader to absorb the information.
[edit] Removed ref
Removed the reference to the P226 being adopted as the Mk24 Mod 0 as it appears incorrect. On the P226 page it notes that the 226 lost out to the 92F as the standard US military sidearm. Perhaps the poster was thinking of the Mk 23 Mod 0 (note that the mod denoted variants and 0 is simply the standard, Mk 23 is the name), which the US SOCOM does make use of. However that's an H&K gun, not a Sig one. --Sycraft
[edit] Bad Links
Most of the links to different types of guns have no article at the other end. I will allow a while for someone to put articles at this end, or they will be deleted.
thank you --Robin63 06:32, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Rename
SIGARMS has recently changed their name. I suggest that this article be renamed to Sig Sauer, and have SIGARMS linked here. Sig.steve 19:51, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
- Done --Deon Steyn 07:49, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
-
- Just finished switching all of the redirects to point here.--LWF 12:56, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] WikiProject class rating
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 14:54, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Requested move
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the proposal was PAGE MOVED to SIG Sauer per discussion below. -GTBacchus(talk) 23:22, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
SIG SAUER → Sig Sauer — WP:MOSTM states that non-standard capitalizations (such as all caps) should be avoided, even if that's the company's name. —Sticky Light (talk) 02:44, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Survey
- Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with
*'''Support'''
or*'''Oppose'''
, then sign your comment with~~~~
. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.
- Support since I see many examples of it written without all caps. Although "Sauer" is a name and should not be in all caps, SIG is an abbreviation and maybe should be? What about "SIG Sauer"? Definitely not all in caps though. Callmederek (talk) 19:27, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
- Support per WP:MOSTM. And anyway, the articles for most of the products have "Sig Sauer", I think this article should maintain uniformity across the encyclopedia. Nburden (T) 20:46, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
- Support SIG Sauer I agree with Callmederek: SIG is an acronym of Schweizerische Industrie Gesellschaft; the convention appears to be to use SIG in capitals: SIG P226, SIG SG 550, SIG P210, SIG SG 510, .357 SIG etc. --Lox (t,c) 13:12, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Discussion
- Any additional comments:
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.