Talk:SIGGRAPH

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] xkcd

any way to work this in? | http://xkcd.com/365/ 24.63.4.126 (talk) 16:04, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

No. The XKCD comic, while humorous, does not contribute to the article. Anutherdavid (talk) 19:31, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Looks as if someone did... 81.227.142.14 (talk) 14:54, 6 January 2008 (UTC)Will

[edit] ACM SIG and conference

SIGGRAPH, though part of ACM, has become its own entity. Newbies to SIGGRAPH may not make the connection and digging through ACM's extensive history and sections would bury SIGGARPH. Let's leave it separate and give it the independent page it deserves for being such a great conference. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.39.5.58 (talk • contribs) 07:15, 6 September 2005

I propose to move SIGGRAPH to SIGGRAPH (conference) and ACM SIGGRAPH to SIGGRAPH (Special Interest Group), and to recreate SIGGRAPH as a disambiguation page. I find the current situation with SIGGRAPH describing the conference and ACM SIGGRAPH describing the Special Interest Group confusing. —Tobias Bergemann 10:37, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

I'd prefer disamb links at the top of the articles, which would clear up confusion preserve the ease with which the articles can be linked to. — brighterorange (talk) 13:13, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] ed2k links

What is the wikipedia policy regarding ed2k links in articles? Is there a special format that should be adhered to? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.250.54.212 (talk • contribs) 00:40, 20 February 2006