User talk:Sidam

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Welcome from Brian0918

Welcome!

Hello, Sidam, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, please be sure to sign your name on Talk and vote pages using four tildes (~~~~) to produce your name and the current date, or three tildes (~~~) for just your name. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome! — BRIAN0918 • 2005-08-13 04:52

[edit] Electromagnetic induction

If you want to discuss the text you're putting on Electromagnetic induction on the talk page, it could be useful. The rest of us can't read your formatting properly, and you're writing over a perfectly good article. -- SCZenz 04:53, 18 August 2005 (UTC)

Please abstain from inserting again and again the strance physics texts in Electromagnetic induction etc. At least, explain yourself on the article talk page. --Pjacobi 18:06, August 18, 2005 (UTC)

You might be interested in taking a look at Wikipedia:Consensus. If there is material you feel belongs at electromagnetic induction that other editors don't like, you should discuss why you feel it belongs there on the talk page so that the editors can arrive at consensus, rather than engaging in a revert war that you are sure to eventually lose by sheer numbers. --Laura Scudder | Talk 20:17, 18 August 2005 (UTC)

"Faraday's induction" is "Magnetoelectric induction", which is writting on the page - "Magnetoelectric induction (Faraday's induction). This page "Electromagnetic induction" has the relation to other new phenomenon. Sidam 02:55, 19 August 2005 (UTC)

If you want to introduce new phenomena in physics, i.e. phenomena not covered in standard textbooks, please provide references to peer reviewed scientific journals where these phenomena are described. Please compare Wikipedia:No original research. --Pjacobi 07:25, August 19, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Magnetoelectric force

I moved the "Magnetoelectric force" article to a subbpage of your user area: User:Sidam/Magnetoelectric force.

As "Magnetoelectric force" was deleted following the VfD process (see Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Magnetoelectric force), you can't symple re-create it again and again.

You can copy-edit your draft at User:Sidam/Magnetoelectric force and then argue, e.g. in Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Physics about its usefullness.

Pjacobi 17:26, August 19, 2005 (UTC)

Same problem with Electrodynamic force, see Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Electrodynamic force. --Pjacobi 10:46, August 21, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Vandalism warning

Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you were just trying to experiment, then use the sandbox instead. Thank you.

The above is an official vandalism warning. If you don't think your article is vandalism, this would be a good time to start discussing it. Try either Talk:Electromagnetic_induction or User_talk:SCZenz. Thanks. -- SCZenz 21:00, 25 August 2005 (UTC)

I have temporarily reverted Electromagnetic induction as the new text is unreadable and messy. Does it come from a translation program?--Rjstott 05:47, 13 August 2005 (UTC)

Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks.

[edit] Nomination for deletion

I have nominated one of your articles for deletion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Electric capacitivity, and have tagged some others for merger. There may be more to come, so take this as notice that this might happen, I probably won't contact you about each one. Gene Nygaard 14:33, 31 March 2006 (UTC)

I have deleted two of your articles: "Electric inductive coil" and "Electric inductance". You seem to have translated them from another language and not noticed, because of your incorrect terminology, that they are duplicates of existing articles. I shan't delete any more without consulting other editors. --Heron 17:31, 14 April 2007 (UTC)