Talk:Sidux
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is part of the Linux WikiProject, a group of Wikipedians interested in improving the encyclopaedic coverage of articles relating to Linux, and who are involved in developing and proposing standards for their content, presentation and other aspects.
If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.
|
| Start | This article has been rated as start-Class on the quality scale. |
Contents |
[edit] Article updates
On 18th March 2008 this article was suggested for deletion. Due to this fact, cleanups were done and the desired external references were added, only hours later. Further work will be put in this article in the next days. I wonder how easy some folks handle deletions - trashing the work of others! At least an visit of the linked homepage could be taken into account. In my eyes it is not understandable, how someone afterwards could still think of deleting. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wwwolf3 (talk • contribs) 23:18, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
Today I removed the Article cleanup tag. This was sticking since a year on this article and noone else removed it. If there are any complaints about the article or elements of it - everyone is welcome here to discuss about it and to improve the article together. Complains about english grammar are also welcome, as most of this text is created by non native english speakers. Help us!
A lot of work is done, however still not finished. There are certainly mistakes and typos, so please help in getting them out. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wwwolf3 (talk • contribs) 00:05, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
Chealer was so nice to correct some things and did a little cleanup, however there are now many [citation needed][clarify] Tags. I catch this ball and try to link them with references, but please accept deletion of few. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sidux&diff=201279379&oldid=200664850--Wwwolf3 (talk) 19:25, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
For tonight, I finish and leave some of the stickers for tomorrow. Having removed the cleanup tag.--Wwwolf3 (talk) 23:54, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Advert problems
Can someone please specify what part of the article can be misunderstood as advertisement and what kind of sources should be referenced else? And can someone please explain why it is not wanted to explain something about the future of a distribution? --—Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.171.59.167 (talk • contribs) 13:24, 27 January 2007
- Sidux isn't future software. It's run on my system !!! --Qaridarium 15:42, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
- The advertising parts have improved, but there are a few traces remaining, like "comfortable" and "easily". For the sources, we can't tell you where to take them. People that add information need to add their sources.--Chealer 18:37, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
-
- "easily" and "comfortable" are removed - I think the label "advertisment" can be removed now? And sources are cited too (distrowatch.com, techpatterns.com, sidux-wiki). JaKi143 16:05, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
-
-
- Hey ip! The netinstall is not option any longer and there is some more that is not right!
-
and Qaridarium, as this is only a preview-release at the moment, it is future software, if you read the tag right, it says, it might contain future software, so it's possible, that the content will change! So after the release is out, there will be changes to the content of this article! - tania --84.135.205.100 19:18, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
-
-
-
- Can you please specify which parts are not right? Alternatively: change'em :) JaKi143 16:05, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
-
-
- Hey Guys! Do You know at least the basic principle of Debian-Sid? There will be never ever a FINAL! This is in its nature. So Sidux cant be even final, but it exists! Do you know THE Final Human?! He doesnt exist and will never - in the end he dies! Will be WP even be Final?! NO! So dont be foolish, or is WP based on Vista? Maybeeeee... --—Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.82.255.252 (talk • contribs) 09:39, 1 February 2007
- Suggestion to improve article quality: An English native speaker please have a look at the collection of 3rd party reviews I have compiled at http://sidux.com/module-Reviews.html add them to external links (and references, if appropriate). There are even more reviews in other languages. The history should also mention the DistroWatch Donation sidux was awarded with. I would also add a short remark that despite the relevance sidux already has, the German Wikipedia admins insist on deleting all articles about it. Greetings, Chris
[edit] Cleanup
I was asked on my talk page why this article is tagged cleanup. Checking the article, I realized that "Linux" appears in complete lowercase in the first sentence. I hope that answers the question.--Chealer 03:15, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
- Not my area of expertise, but I went through the article to clean up the language. It had a definate non-english speaker flavor to it. It should be better now, though it double checking my work would be a good idea. --Lendorien 20:02, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
Cleanup is currently in preparation and will be finished in the next days. --Wwwolf2 08:46, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Monolithic tarball?
Is that a joke? A monolithic tarball containing the source code? Probably vandelism. Funny vandelism, but still vandelism. --Lendorien 14:55, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] german wikipedia
Due to exessive deletions and debates, there is no more version of the german wikipedia article of sidux online. However a draft can be found at user page: http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benutzer:Ron.W/Sidux[1]
I hope one day an admin will find the time to put it back to the public de.wikipedia.org. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wwwolf3 (talk • contribs) 18:30, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
Another good german wiki article is linked here:
http://freiesoftware.a.wiki-site.com/index.php/Sidux[2] —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wwwolf3 (talk • contribs) 20:13, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
might be interesting to read this lines:
Benutzer:Eike sauer aus Wikipedia, der freien Enzyklopädie Wechseln zu: Navigation, Suche
Ich bin seit dem 28. April 2004 bei der Wikipedia aktiv und war vom 1. Mai 2005 bis zum 8. Oktober 2007 Administrator.
Ich habe jahrelang jedem erzählt, dass die Wikipedia zwar manchmal chaotisch ist, aber nie grundsätzlich unfair, und dass die vielberufene "Admin-Willkür" nicht existiere.
Ich werde heute meinen Admin-Status abgeben und mich zum größten Teil aus der Wikipedia zurückziehen. Das war für mich eine Frage der Gerechtigkeit. Ein Versuch zu beweisen, dass hier nicht nach Ansehen der Benutzer dem einen etwas erlaubt und dem nächsten verboten wird. Der Versuch ist gescheitert.
Es mag richtige und wichtige Gründe gegeben haben, gegen das Meinungsbild zu stimmen, und es sind unter den Ablehnern Menschen, deren Urteil mir nach wie vor wichtig ist. Es ist das Gesamtbild, das mich zum Aufgeben bewegt.
Eike, 8. Oktober 2007
Neutraler Standpunkt
Ich kann mir kaum ein besseres Zeugnis für meine Bemühungen um Neutralität denken, als innerhalb eines Tages sowohl als Anhänger der PDS/Linkspartei (auch [1]) als auch als Gegner der WASG/Linkspartei bezeichnet zu werden. Später wurde ich auch als Anhänger der WASG, aber Gegner der PDS (Die Seite wurde gelöscht und wird nur Admins angezeigt.) "geoutet". Ich wurde schon (von einem altgedienten Nutzer) für einen CDU-Anhänger gehalten und von einem erklärten Linken für "rechts". Ein Antifaschist hält mich wohl für einen Helfer von Neonazis ("Da können sie dann umso unbehelligter ihr Unwesen treiben!"), und ein Anhänger von Karl Liebknecht und Rosa Luxemburg sogar für "rechts bis rechtsextrem".
PS: Ich sage nicht, dass es die einzig seeligmachende Methode ist, in der Wikipedia möglichst neutral zu arbeiten. Man kann auch einen Standpunkt öffentlich vertreten und trotzdem hilfreich für die Wikipedia sein, solange man bereit ist, sachlich und fair zu diskutieren und Kompromisse einzugehen. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wwwolf3 (talk • contribs) 22:33, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
