Talk:Shulamith Firestone

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	Chicago Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles related to Chicago.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or if there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's quality scale. [FAQ] Please rate the article and, if you wish, leave comments here regarding your assessment or the strengths and weaknesses of the article.

[edit] Anonymous IP addition

Not that it sounds impluasible at all, but I'm always suspiscious of misplaced additions by ananoymous IPs, so having not read her works thoroughly myself, I was wondering if anyone could confirm the following:

Firestone also advocated raising children in units of eight to ten adults who would all live together and share the responsibilities of childcare amongst them. Units could apply for a licence to have a child artificially or a woman could opt to have the child herself although the rest of the unit would share the responsibility for supporting her while she was pregnant and would share the child care responsibilities once the child was born.

-Erolos 19:04, 14 May 2006 (UTC)

This isn't necessarily an inaccurate addition, but it is misleading. There is a chapter in The Dialectic of Sex in which Firestone suggests possible alternative social structures, but it's a lot less prescriptive than the passage above makes out. It's in the context of a discussion about avoiding an Orwellian society, not creating one. Firestone is careful to point out that she does not aim at the eradication of individual life, emotion or choice - in fact, she aims at the exact opposite. A fairer summary of the point she makes would be to say "Firestone explored a number of possible social changes that she argued would result in a post-patriarchal society, including the abolition of the nuclear family and the promotion of community living." I'll amend the article. -- TinaSparkle 15:30, 28 February 2007 (UTC)