User talk:Shotlandiya

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Welcome to Wikipedia!!!

Hello Shotlandiya! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Below are some recommended guidelines to facilitate your involvement. Happy Editing! -- Kukini 17:45, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
Getting Started
Getting your info out there
Getting more Wikipedia rules
Getting Help
Getting along
Getting technical

[edit] Edit Summary Request

I have noted that you often edit without an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This is considered an important guideline in Wikipedia. Even a short summary is better than no summary. An edit summary is even more important if you delete any text; otherwise, people may think you're being sneaky or even vandalizing. Also, mentioning one change but not another one can be misleading to someone who finds the other one more important; add "and misc." to cover the other change(s). Thanks! -- Kukini 17:45, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Hello!

Hello, Shotlandiya. I see, you are online. Please, leave here a short message, and type four tildes after it. Let is see, hoe does it work. dima 10:32, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

Does this work? Shotlandiya 13:28, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

Yes, Shotlandiya! Very good. I finished with Vladimir Bukovsky. Did you see the movies I cited? Do you like the correction of the confusion with the passport? Type your comments at the Talk:Vladimir Bukovsky, and let us think if we can even improve it.dima 15:26, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] August 2007

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Garry Kasparov. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors. KerotanLeave Me a Message Have a nice day :) 13:15, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "Can anyone explain why this account has been blocked? From what I can understand, my IP address has been blocked from editing as it is a shared address for the House of Commons, but I thought having my own Wikipedia username got around this problem. I certainly don't want to have to open a new account as I've made quite a few edits on this one and would like to carry on. Can anyone help?"

Decline reason: "Most likely, you've been hit by an autoblock. Someone else using an account from the same address has been blocked and so all users are temporarily blocked. This happens automatically and is because vandals regularly use alternate accounts to continue editing. Please follow these instructions so we can lift the autoblock. — Yamla (talk) 16:11, 13 December 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

[edit] WP:OR edit warring - Scottish mafia

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. --Mais oui! (talk) 13:30, 15 April 2008 (UTC)