User talk:Shmede

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Brown Town7 would like to nominate you to become an administrator. Please visit Wikipedia:Requests for adminship to see what this process entails, and then contact Brown Town7 to accept or decline the nomination. A page has been created for your nomination at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Shmede. If you accept the nomination, you must formally state and sign your acceptance and answer the questions on that page. Once you have answered the questions, you may post your nomination for discussion, or request that your nominator do so.

Contents

[edit] Nonsense of Snaymobile

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Snaymobile, by Brianga (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Snaymobile provides no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Snaymobile, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 10:25, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

Brown town

A tag has been placed on Brown town, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.

If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this. LittleOldMe 10:37, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. LittleOldMe 10:37, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] My Edits to your Userpage

I am extremely sorry about editing your userpage. I got a bit carried away with reverting vandalism with Lupin's tool. I reverted my edit, so again, sorry.--NeoNerd 18:11, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Blocked

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for disrupting Requests for Adminship with a nonsensical nomination. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

Note that I've also deleted your userpage which contained attacks on other people. Pascal.Tesson 17:07, 28 October 2007 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "i appear to have been blocked form wikipedia because of the offensive language of another user. the same user that has requested i become admin. the reason why i should be blocked for this users behaviour is not apparent to me at this time. if you could explain how another user has managed to block me that would be great, thanks."

Decline reason: "I would be happy to explain. Wikipedia policy does not allow you to create a second account in order to frivolously nominate yourself for adminship; if you want to nominate yourself; use this account, but I strongly advise against it, since neither of your accounts has ever made a useful edit to the encyclopedia. — FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 17:38, 28 October 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "i fail to see how there is any evidence to suggest that i am somehow associated with the account of this other user. i know this user yes, but he has nominated me for reasons beyond my understanding. the two accounts are operated by different people. therefore i fail to see how i have in any way disrupted wikiepdia. i would appreciate the speedy restoration of my userpage and my block to be lifted "

Decline reason: "See below. MaxSem 17:58, 28 October 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

Your userpage is not going to be restored; it violates both the userpage guidelines and the rule against personal attacks. You do not appear to be interested in helping write an encyclopedia; I encourage you to consider that Wikipedia may not be the right place for you to have your fun. MySpace doesn't have any rules against the sorts of things you're doing, and no one there is trying to write an encyclopedia. You might be happier there than here. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 17:46, 28 October 2007 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "i understand your concern, but the information is collected for, and added to by, all those mentioned within it. to my understanding all content is added with the permission of the person in question in each case. it merely works as an encyclopaedia for a small group of people, a niche market if you will, but it serves a purpose. "

Decline reason: "The rationale you provided is simply unacceptable. Because you simply don't seem to understand what Wikipedia is, I've extended your block to indefinite. If you want to contribute positively, please familiarize yourself with our core principles and request unblock once more. MaxSem 17:58, 28 October 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.