User talk:ShizuokaHen

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Notability of MOIST (Marinos Official International Supporters Team)

A tag has been placed on MOIST (Marinos Official International Supporters Team) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. --Diniz (talk) 12:02, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

The article has been deleted; "notable to you" doesn't quite matter, please read our notability guidelines, as well as our sourcing guidelines. You can't just link to something's page and say they did something that, honestly, is not remotely notable even within the context, and expect it to remain more than a few minutes. Also, it just wasn't written all that well. And finally, it was deleted by AFD back in October; if you disagree with the deletion, go to deletion review instead of recreating the article. --Golbez (talk) 12:24, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

Never mind; just saw the edits you made to people's talk pages saying you reverted them for making faulty edits, when neither you nor them have touched the pages in question. Goodbye. --Golbez (talk) 12:26, 24 November 2007 (UTC)