Talk:Sheridan Le Fanu

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Sheridan Le Fanu article.
Article policies
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.
Biography Portal
Start This article has been rated as start-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
This article is supported by the Arts and Entertainment work group.
Maintenance An appropriate infobox may need to be added to this article, or the current infobox may need to be updated. Please refer to the list of biography infoboxes for further information.
This article, category, or template is part of WikiProject Horror, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to horror film and fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Start This article has been rated as start-Class on the assessment scale.
Ireland Portal
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Ireland on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, visit the project page.
B This article has been rated as B-Class on the Project's quality scale. See comments for details.
Mid This article has been rated as mid-importance on the priority scale.

Both Green Tea and Carmilla are shortish stories, and almost certainly in the public domain; would it be useful to put them up as an illustration to this article (which I intend to flesh out)? sjc

I have added a link to an etext of Carmilla in the main article. --- hajhouse
find his prose too wordy and his characters frustratingly daft.

POV? I haven't heard many who complain about the quality of his prose and characterization. Mandel 07:08, Dec 9, 2004 (UTC)

No less NPOV than a lot of necessary concessions to literary critical practices in a wiki context, one might argue. But I suppose I have to grant that describing early Victorian prose narrative style as wordy or belaboured from a contemporary point of view is a bit like describing first world war era film as 'a bit grainy'. Le Fanu strikes me as far from the worst offender in this department, given his era, so as far as I'm concerned, this could stand to be omitted simply because insofar as it is true, it goes without saying in historical context, and I think this is within that minimum of attention to historical context one can assume of the general wiki audience. I'll change this to something which at least acknowledges historical context iminently, barring objections or useful citations --Yst 22:59, 2 January 2006 (UTC)

Is "Sheridan" the forename and "Le Fanu" the family name? How about the grandmother "Alice Sheridan Le Fanu", then? Isn't in fact "Sheridan Le Fanu" the family name, and Joseph the forename? Who knows for sure? The Library of Congress catalog has 75 entries for "Le Fanu, Joseph Sheridan". while "Le Fanu, Sheridan" is a redirect to the full name. --LA2 08:41, 2005 Jan 31 (UTC)

[edit] Rewrite

I've done a fairly extensive re-write of this article. However I still think it can be improved (and expanded) a lot more. What do you think? Colin4C 03:05, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

I think it reads a lot better now, but I agree it could be expanded further. Natalieduerinckx 10:48, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

I'm working on it Natalie...(and maybe you too?). I must confess my amazement that such an important writer as Sheridan Le Fanu arouses so little interest amongst wikipedia editors. And there is still no wikipedia article for Uncle Silas, which still remains defiantly red on the hyperlink...Colin4C 17:15, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
I've been rereading Uncle Silas (hadn't read it for about 2 decades!) so I've started a new page for it. My plot summary gets vague at the end because I'm still only 2/3rds through it, though I remember roughly how it goes. I think the main thing that needs to be done is in the "influence" bit at the end. Also a bibliography of good books & editions would be handy, e.g. the WJ McCormack book. --ND 04:58, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
Great! I've made a start on a page for The Purcell Papers, by the way, which probably could be vastly improved...Would be great if we could do for Le Fanu what other wikipedia editors have done for Poe and Lovecraft, for instance...Colin4C 06:17, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
Well, that will require me to read more of his works! I do have a half-dozen of them around in my wife's collection. Plus the two Dover editions of his short stories (haven't seen The Purcell Papers, just those selections). -- I think the most important thing isn't so much the addition of plot summaries &c as trying to explain what's distinctive/significant about his work, giving critical quotes of utility, &c. --ND 06:44, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
Finished the book--at the moment I'm inclined to leave my plot summary as it stands, since I'm not sure that any more needs to be said about the mechanics of the plot. -- Any reason why you (C4C) deleted your earlier comments on this page? I don't mind, it's just that I didn't see anything wrong with them. Yeah, WJ MacCormack is extremely quirky; I know his writing on/editing of Austin Clarke better, but it's also a little idiosyncratic.... He's also a kind of interesting poet (under the name Hugh Maxton). --ND 22:48, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
Well after I had written my comments, I found that I wasn't addressing your points at all, but had gone off on a tangent of my own. I have some strong hunches about where Le Fanu is coming from, but as I can't back them up by references, perhaps discretion is the best option....Anyway (hint to budding writers) I do think a new biography of Le Fanu is called for, with more emphasis on the unconscious, folklore, the supernatural and questions of sexuality, (plus, of course, large colour pictures of Ingrid Pitt as 'Carmilla'........).Colin4C 11:42, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] More novels

Just added a page for The House by the Churchyard. Corrections/expansions are welcome! I "straightened out" the plot a lot in the effort to make things clear, in the sense that rather than detailing revelations in the order they appear in the book (since this would entail giving things in very skewed sequence) I gave things in roughly chronological order. --ND 10:11, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

Looks good. Maybe a good idea to link to Chapelizod? Colin4C 10:42, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Reference in lead

Putting a reference in an article's lead is discouraged, since the lead is intended merely as a summary of information that appears elsewhere in the article. If Sage's introduction is the source for any statements in the body of the article, please place the reference at the appropriate point. And it should be in the form "Sage, Victor. Introduction. Uncle Silas by Sheridan Le Fanu. Penguin, 2000" or similar. Deor 00:27, 1 March 2007 (UTC)