Wikipedia talk:Shared IP flagging proposal

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Debate goes here. Since this involves a change to the MediaWiki software, a better idea would be to file a Bugzilla report and ask the devs how feasible this is. >Radiant< 14:35, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

The Dev's are pretty busy. I thnk it's a good idea to discuss on wiki before filing a change request, to make sure that what gets requested is thought through. Regards, Ben Aveling 01:31, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] School IPs

Would school IPs be flagged under this policy? Even though they can be shared by thousands of possible editors, they tend to be a lot more vandalous then your typical AOL IP. In fact, a look at WP:ABUSE shows that several static school IPs have been permablocked at the request of the school due to persistant vandalism. MER-C 14:10, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

School IPs meet all the criteria: they are shared, they are often used to vandalise, and they are often used by good editors as well. Therefore, school IPs will be flagged under this proposal (which is not a policy). My school IP has been blocked, and I would prefer it be flagged as shared. --J.L.W.S. The Special One 13:46, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Comments

I appreciate your enthousiasm, but Wikipedia proposals aren't enacted by voting upon them (see also WP:DDV), and feature requests (for software extensions) have to be implemented by the Developers who are not swayed by majority opinion. I would recommend that you ask for feedback on this proposal at e.g. the village pump, or discuss with Brion Vibber (and the other devs) as to its feasibility. As for myself, I think this is a useful idea in principle, but would like to see some statistics to point out this is actually a problem. >Radiant< 14:37, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

What if it were to be called a "straw poll"? --WikiSlasher 15:03, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

• That kind of missed the point. Wikipedia proposals aren't enacted through straw polls (see also WP:DDV), and feature requests (for software extensions) have to be implemented by the Developers who are not swayed by straw polls. You need to convince the devs here that there is a problem that can be solved; you cannot convince a dev by having people countersign your claim, only by having solid arguments. >Radiant< 15:11, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
• I was poking fun at the fact that lots of things on Wikipedia seem to have straw polls with them ;) --WikiSlasher 16:01, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
  • I think the most appropriate quote would be, "is voting against a vote on whether voting on disruption to make a point is disruption to make a point, disruption to make a point?" >Radiant< 16:07, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] An alternate 'fix'

See also: Wikipedia_talk:Autoblock#Autoblock_bypass_proposal