User talk:Shaldares

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Speedy deletion of Shaeltris

A tag has been placed on Shaeltris requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. AniMate 07:11, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Reasoning behind deletion nomination (copied from article talk)

This is not just a social group, but a topic on a religion. I do not see why you should not delete christianity, muslim, buddhism, or wicca, and delete this one.

One of the core values of this project is verifiability. With each of the religions you listed above there are hundreds of thousand (if not millions) of reliable sources for us to draw from. They are also notable. This religion doesn't appear to be verifiable, notable, or have any reliable sources that discuss it. Also, it doesn't appear to written from a neutral point of view. I apologize for any offense you may take from this, but this doesn't appear to be the type of article that is appropriate for Wikipedia. AniMate 09:53, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Shaeltris

Another editor has added the {{prod}} template to the article Shaeltris, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 15:00, 28 March 2008 (UTC)