User talk:ShakespeareFan00/Archive5

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

User talk:ShakespeareFan00/Archive1 User talk:ShakespeareFan00/Archive2 User talk:ShakespeareFan00/Archive3 User talk:ShakespeareFan00/Archive 4

Contents 1 Images to commons 2 Copyright 3 Regarding Link Removal 4 Please reinstate links you removed 5 Why?

[edit] Images to commons

Please stop moving images from Category:Images of people replacing placeholders without at least a token effort to make sure they are not copyvios.Genisock2 (talk) 19:47, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

Which images are problematic? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:39, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

a bit over 90% of them.Genisock2 (talk) 22:18, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Copyright

Hi SharkespeareFan00!

Only a note for you: I'm a user from the german Wikipedia. Sorry for my very bad english! :) I've seen, cause I want it to send to commons, that your Copyright-Signature from this image was deleted from the uploading user. -> Link. He said that the image is an alteration of this image. In germany it's forbidden to do that, cause he haven't got the copyright from the original image. I dont know if it's also forbidden in England. Could you please consider it? If you have questions please contact me at my discussion-page in de.wikipedia. Thank you and greetings from germany. Bye! de.Srvban :)

[edit] Regarding Link Removal

Heya Awhile back you removed a link to the Underdogs website from Emperor of the Fading Suns. Stated reason was that it was a "Warez" site. Could I recieve some clarification on the reasoning, as it is one of the few places the game can be found as it is no longer in publication. --Wilson (talk) 15:11, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Please reinstate links you removed

Please self-revert your own hasty deletions of links to books.google.com especially in all Poland related articles. Your pretentious and misinformed idea of "provider-duality"[1] sounds preposterous. Hence, your unilateral actions stemming from probable lack of understanding of what copyright is, can only be seen as disruptive. --Poeticbent talk 20:40, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Why?

So you've deleted my entire page (I'm a bit of a novice at this so it took me over an hour) over the dispute over ONE photograph. This, quite frankly, is appallingly unfair. I have posession over that image because I'm in it and I am friends with the photographer in question (which, by the way, I said in the copyright information section). But thankyou, with very, VERY heavy sarcasm. --Alex. 14:17, 28 April 2008 (UTC)