User talk:Shahab

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Notice Welcome to my talk page! Feel free to leave messages. I shall try to respond to them as soon as I can.

Please add new comments at the bottom of the page, and don't forget to sign comments with four tildes (~~~~)

Contents

[edit] Article in need of cleanup - please assist if you can

[edit] message

hello "shahab": it seems u r more interested in constitutional rather than philosophical way of living. your user boxes (User:Shahab/Userboxes/Muslim_Anarchist User:Shahab/Userboxes/Alexandre Dumas User:Shahab/Userboxes/Sherlockian User:Shahab/Userboxes/Gandhism)and contributions indicate.

about anarchism i know someting . but dont know islam and its connection again the uropian writers sherlock & dumas concentrate on social & political of europe say ogden nash (american poet)who was critically against us capitalism gandhi was not so political and many politicize him . this is completely wrong

come 2 c about mathematica de shahab how u wanna approach 2 write any aricle in mathematics

[edit] thanks

Your Positive Response give me Very Much Hope now we can work together to Improve some Important and relevant articles of Sufism related.Presently im engaged in debate with some one against Mawlid and like topics.plz come at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Mawlid thanks.User:shabiha —Preceding comment was added at 21:32, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] RE: Your recent WP:UNI/COTF Nomination

Just a friendly reminder, WP:UNI/COTF is not a publicity booster for universities. Please read our university guidelines regarding our selection processes as well our general article guidelines. It clearly states that we are not here to promote the university. It is simply to improve existing articles regarding an education institution, not to gain publicity. - Jameson L. Tai talkcontribs 16:48, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Gandhi

Thank you for your response. I hope that you please forgive the tardiness of my response. As you may judge from the length of it, I was not always up to writing it in a single go. Upon re-reading the response, I feel that I may have presented my views in an overly harsh fashion. I hope that you will not take them in as a negative reproach of your views. I have been informed that my officious, and perhaps "prim" fashion of writing is at times off-putting.--Cast (talk) 06:40, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Pilgrim template

Hi I noticed you made a change to the Pilgramage sites of India template. I just thought I'd let you know, the template is not being used in any articles. Cheers. Adam (talk) (talk) 04:39, 9 June 2008 (UTC)