Talk:Shaun Tait

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or if there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
Start	This article has been rated as start-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
	This article is supported by the Sports and games work group.

Portal	Shaun Tait is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on the quality scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian sports.
Assessment comments This article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.

	Cricket Portal Click here for information about how the WikiProject assesses notability Shaun Tait is part of WikiProject Cricket which aims to expand and organise information better in articles related to the sport of cricket. Please participate by visiting the project page for more details.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
Additional information: This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status: Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar: not checked Supporting materials: not checked Categories and templates: not checked To fill out this checklist, please add the following to the template call: <!-- 1. It is suitably referenced, and all major points have appropriate inline citations. --> |B-Class-1=yes/no <!-- 2. It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain major omissions or inaccuracies. --> |B-Class-2=yes/no <!-- 3. It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content. --> |B-Class-3=yes/no <!-- 4. It is free from major grammatical errors. --> |B-Class-4=yes/no <!-- 5. It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams. --> |B-Class-5=yes/no <!-- 6. It is fully and correctly categorised and carries all appropriate templates. --> |B-Class-6=yes/no

[edit] New picture?

I have no idea how to put a new one in but could someone try because the photo is one of the worst on wiki.

[edit] New order

I am taking this article under my wing. How long that will last, who knows? Overuse of inverted commas and use of the words 'considered' and 'some' in the opening sound like there was a battle for bias. Under Test Cricket there is a blatantly erroneous statement about him retiring. The poor grammar and mention of 'downfall of Australians' and 'historic test at WACA' suggest that the article was edited by at least one zealous Indian fan. The concern is that although not ultimately important, some effort should be made so that significant international players are properly documented, after all, . It's quite unusual to see a bad article with nearly 100 references. One way or another, people have gone to the trouble of putting good content in. It's worth appreciating that so that they come back and do it again, rather than become disenfranchised. MrAngy (talk) 08:51, 9 April 2008 (UTC)