Talk:Shane Rockland

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject LGBT studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBT related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, visit the project page.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-class on the quality scale.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
This article is supported by the Arts and Entertainment work group.
This article is part of WikiProject Pornography, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to pornography-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Stub This article has been rated as stub-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

[edit] Contradictory

This article contradicts Vince Rockland. The account of how the Shane got involved in porn is different. --Sbrools (talk . contribs) 03:08, 28 December 2006 (UTC)


>The difference is rather inconsequencial. The one listed under "Shane Rockland" is more of an industry blurb - an industry that isn't so different from any other in the sense that everyone want the juicy details regardless of how unsubstantiated the facts are. I'm surprised that you haven't realized by now that America isn't about delivering facts.

Ok, back to the subject: The article on Shane Rockland claims that Shane was "recruited" by Vince Rockland, although Vince Rockland insists that he "didn't think that it was a bright idea" for either one of his brothers to join. He maintains that it's easy for young people to to be mislead by illusory promises of rising to a higher finacial bracket through the medium of porn.

For questions can reach me at vince.rockland@earthlink.net —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.193.17.211 (talk) 00:54, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Three brothers dvd.jpg

Image:Three brothers dvd.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 01:59, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Consider f0r Deletion

This article has no notability and has been tagged for a long time for numerous problems. No valid citations can be obtained! This really should be deleted! Fuzzyred (talk) 22:03, 4 December 2007 (UTC)